Strategic Self-Praise in Anonymous Language Service Platforms: A Pragmatic Study of Dating Advertisements on QQ Zone Confession Wall in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63385/jlss.v2i1.411Keywords:
Online Dating, Self-Praise, Language Services, Pragmatic Strategy, QQ Zone Confession WalAbstract
The development of the internet has made online socializing and partner seeking possible, thereby enabling single individuals to communicate and match with one another across temporal and geographical boundaries within virtual spaces. The rise of online dating has drawn scholarly attention from fields such as sociology, psychology, and linguistics, giving rise to a growing body of research on the topic. Digitally mediated communication, marked by reduced contextual cues, requires users to invest greater interpretive effort to reach mutual understanding. This study employs a combined pragmatic and language-service perspective to analyze self-praise strategies in dating advertisements on China’s QQ Zone Confession Wall. It explores how these strategies are utilized within the platform’s anonymous and community-mediated setting to build favorable identities and attain relational objectives. Results show that the distribution of unadorned explicit self-praise (47.22%) and modified explicit self-praise (47.22%) is the same, while the frequency of the implicit strategy is the lowest (5.56%). The study illustrates how users tactically make use of the platform’s language service features, which include anonymity, public communality, and multimodal affordances, to initiate relationships. This highlights the role of digital platforms not only as communication channels but as active mediators that influence pragmatic behavior in online courtship.
References
[1]Filice, E., Abeywickrama, K.D., Parry, D.C., et al., 2022. Sexual violence and abuse in online dating: A scoping review. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 67, 101781.
[2]Bandinelli, C., Gandini, A., 2022. Dating apps: The uncertainty of marketised love. Cultural Sociology. 16 (3), 423–441.
[3]Degen, J.L., Kleeberg-Niepage, A., 2023. Profiling the self in mobile online dating apps: A serial picture analysis. Human Arenas. 6(1), 147–171.
[4]Qu, S.B., 2024. Three concept clusters of the research language service in the new era. Applied Linguistics. 4, 2–14. (in Chinese)
[5]Ding, L., 2025. Language services and smart city emergency management. Decision Science. 1, 25–32. (in Chinese)
[6]Ren, W., Guo, Y.P., 2022. Pragmatic study of self-praise on Wechat moment. Foreign Language Research. 2, 8–14.
[7]Dayter, D., 2014. Self-praise in microblogging. Journal of Pragmatics. 61, 91–102.
[8]Dayter, D., 2021. Dealing with interactionally risky speech acts in simultaneous interpreting: The case of self-praise. Journal of Pragmatics. 174, 28–42.
[9]Rüdiger, S., Dayter, D., 2020. Manbragging online: Self-praise on pick-up artists’ forums. Journal of Pragmatics. 161, 16–27.
[10]Wu, H., Zhang, L., Ren, S., 2023. A comparative study of self-praise on English and Chinese social media: Strategies, themes, and motivations. Frontiers in Psychology. 14, 1279853.
[11]Duan, J.Y., Wang, G.X., Li, F., 2020. Influence of self-bragging on advice taking. Journal of Psychological Science. 43(4), 898–903. (in Chinese)
[12]Speer, S.A., 2012. The interactional organization of self-praise: Epistemics, preference organization, and implications for identity research. Social Psychology Quarterly. 75(1), 52–79.
[13]Li, X.L., 2018. Reflections on the problems of language-service research. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences). 50(2), 51–57. (in Chinese)
[14]Rosenfeld, M.J., Thomas, R.J., Hausen, S., 2019. Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the United States displaces other ways of meeting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116(36), 17753–17758.
[15]Sharabi, L.L., Dorrance-Hall, E., 2024. The online dating effect: Where a couple meets predicts the quality of their marriage. Computers in Human Behavior. 150(C), 107973.
[16]Parks, M.R., Adelman, M.B., 1983. Communication networks and the development of romantic relationships: An expansion of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research. 10(1), 55–79.
[17]Duguay, S., Dietzel, C., Myles, D., 2024. The year of the “virtual date”: Reimagining dating app affordances during the COVID-19 pandemic. New Media & Society. 26(3), 1384–1402.
[18]Brand, R.J., Bonatsos, A., D’Orazio, R., et al., 2012. What is beautiful is good, even online: Correlations between photo attractiveness and text attractiveness in men’s online dating profiles. Computers in Human Behavior. 28(1), 166–170.
[19]Thomas, M.F., Binder, A., Matthes, J., 2024. The psychological influence of dating app matches: The more matches the merrier? New Media & Society. 26(12), 6995–7019.
[20]Heller, M., 2017. Can language be a commodity. In: Cavanaugh, J.R., Shankar, S. (Eds.). Language and Materiality. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 251–254.
[21]Cameron, D., 2012. The commodification of language: English as a global commodity. In: Nevalainen, T., Traugott, E.C. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp. 352–362.
[22]Park, J.S.-Y., Wee, L., 2021. World Englishes and the commodification of language. In: Rubdy, R., Tupas, R., Saraceni, M. (Eds.). Bloomsbury World Englishes: Volume 2: Ideologies. Bloomsbury: London, UK. pp. 64–80.
[23]Qu, S.B., 2018. Observing and considering China’s language vitality and language serviceability. Academic Research. 3, 155–160. (in Chinese)
[24]Ren, W., Guo, Y., 2020. Self-praise on Chinese social networking sites. Journal of Pragmatics. 169, 179–189.
[25]Chen, Z.T., 2005. Language Planning Research. The Commercial Press: Beijing, China. (in Chinese)
[26]Hefner, V., Kahn, J., 2014. An experiment investigating the links among online dating profile attractiveness, ideal endorsement, and romantic media. Computers in Human Behavior. 37, 9–17.
[27]Cover, R., 2012. Performing and undoing identity online: Social networking, identity theories and the incompatibility of online profiles and friendship regimes. Convergence. 18(2), 177–193.
[28]Yus, F., 2021. Smartphone Communication: Interactions in the App Ecosystem. Routledge: London, UK.
PDF