Abstract

In the future, health care education will face challenges to adapt to multiple technological tools in teaching and learning. The aim of this study was to describe practical nursing students’ technology acceptance and possible change therein after implementing three-dimensional (3D) technology during a first aid course in the level of vocational education and training in Finland. In this qualitative dominant mixed method study, students used 3D images, 3D environments, and 3D printing during their first aid course. Students answered pre- (n = 30) and post-surveys (n = 28) and, after one month from the first aid course, participated in focus group interviews (n = 30) based on the theoretical framework of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The data was analysed by means of descriptive statistical analysis and qualitative content analysis. As a result, students’ technology acceptance was positively oriented. Five main qualitative categories were identified: 1) Usefulness for education, 2) Usefulness for care work, 3) Benefits for individual role, 4) Preparedness for future technological solutions, and 5) Challenges with technological solutions.  In addition, the quantitative results, although exploratory, indicated statistically significant changes in students’ technology acceptance. As a conclusion, the students reported that using 3D technology in practical nursing education may enhance their technology acceptance. They also stated that it may also prepare them to be more technologically oriented in working life. The promising elements of 3D technology can be taken into consideration when health care educators are planning their teaching.

Keywords

3D TechnologyMixed MethodsPractical Nursing EducationTechnology Acceptance Model

References

  1. [1]European Union (EU), 2018. Council Recommendation of 26 November 2018 on promoting automatic mutual recognition of higher education and upper secondary education and training qualifications and the outcomes of learning periods abroad. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32018H1210(01) (cited 8 January 2025).
  2. [2]Liaw, S.Y., Ooi, S.L., Mildon, R., et al., 2022. Translation of an evidence-based virtual reality simulation-based interprofessional education into health education curriculums: An implementation science method. Nurse Education Today. 110, 105262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105262
  3. [3]Park, G., Oh, H., Lim, B.-C., et al., 2023. Can smart technology make group members more creative? The effect of interactive feedback using sociometric badges on members’ creativity. Behaviour & Information Technology. 42(14), 2452–2466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2126949
  4. [4]Angeli, C., Giannakos, M., 2020. Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior. 105, 106185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185
  5. [5]Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., Fisser, P., 2016. Infusing creativity and technology in 21st century education: A systemic view for change. Educational Technology & Society. 19 (3), 27–37.
  6. [6]Organisation for economic Co-operation and development (OECD), 2021. Access and Cost of Education and Health Services: Preparing Regions for Demographic Change, OECD Rural Studies. OECD Publishing: Paris, France. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/4ab69cf3-en
  7. [7]Amoia-Watters, L., 2023. The effects of the technology application “Socrative” on student engagement in a baccalaureate nursing program. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 18(1), 44–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2022.10.007
  8. [8]Docherty, A., Warkentin, P., Borgen, J., et al., 2018. Enhancing Student Engagement: Innovative Strategies for Intentional Learning. Journal of Professional Nursing. 34(6), 470–474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.05.001
  9. [9]Zhang, S., Wong, G.K.W., 2024. Unravelling the underlying mechanism of computational thinking: The mediating role of attitudinal beliefs between personality and learning performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 40(2), 902–918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12900
  10. [10]Chytas, C., Tsilingiris, A., Diethelm, I., 2019. Exploring Computational Thinking Skills in 3D Printing: A Data Analysis of an Online Makerspace. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Dubai, UAE, 8 April 2019; pp. 1173–1179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725202
  11. [11]Kim, W., 2018. Design of STEAM education process applying 3D printer for computational thinking. International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication. 10(1), 23–30.
  12. [12]Mong, H.H., Standal, Ø.F., 2019. Didactics of health in physical education—A review of literature. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 24(5), 506–518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2019.1631270
  13. [13]Bogomolova, K., Hierck, B.P., Looijen, A.E.M., et al., 2021. Stereoscopic three‐dimensional visualisation technology in anatomy learning: A meta‐analysis. Medical Education. 55(3), 317–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14352
  14. [14]Rutty, J., Biggs, M., Dowsett, D., et al., 2019. Post mortem computed tomography: An innovative tool for teaching anatomy within pre-registration nursing curricula. Nurse Education Today. 76, 154–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.02.001
  15. [15]Alhonkoski, M., Salminen, L., Pakarinen, A., et al., 2021. 3D technology to support teaching and learning in health care education—A scoping review. International Journal of Educational Research. 105, 101699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101699
  16. [16]Baleotti, L.R., Silva, A.L.S.D., Palacio, R.M., 2024. Occupational Therapy and Assistive Technology: Experience in Using 3D Printing and Open Source Platforms. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy—An International Journal. 18(1), 57–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37506/qb3e0551
  17. [17]Chang, Y.M., Lai, C.L., 2018. “Floating heart” application of holographic 3D imaging in nursing education. International Journal of Nursing Education. 10(4), 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-9357.2018.00095.8
  18. [18]Hackett, M., Proctor, M., 2018. The effect of autostereoscopic holograms on anatomical knowledge: A randomised trial. Medical Education. 52(11), 1147–1155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13729
  19. [19]Benham, S., San, S., 2020. Student Technology Acceptance of 3D Printing in Occupational Therapy Education. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 74(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.035402
  20. [20]Halcomb, E., Hickman, L., 2015. Mixed methods research. Nursing Standard. 29(32), 41–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.29.32.41.e8858
  21. [21]Geng, J., 2013. Three-dimensional display technologies. Advances in Optics and Photonics. 5(4), 456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.5.000456
  22. [22]Ulrich, F., Helms, N.H., Frandsen, U.P., et al., 2021. Learning effectiveness of 360° video: Experiences from a controlled experiment in healthcare education. Interactive Learning Environments. 29(1), 98–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1579234
  23. [23]Hackett, M., Proctor, M., 2016. Three-Dimensional Display Technologies for Anatomical Education: A Literature Review. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 25(4), 641–654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9619-3
  24. [24]Chen, C.-J., Chen, Y.-C., Lee, M.-Y., et al., 2021. Effects of three-dimensional holograms on the academic performance of nursing students in a health assessment and practice course: A pretest-intervention-posttest study. Nurse Education Today. 106, 105081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105081
  25. [25]Novak, E., Brannon, M., Librea‐Carden, M.R., et al., 2021. A systematic review of empirical research on learning with 3D printing technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 37(5), 1455–1478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12585
  26. [26]Virani, F.R., Chua, E.C., Timbang, M.R., et al., 2022. Three-Dimensional Printing in Cleft Care: A Systematic Review. The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal. 59(4), 484–496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211013175
  27. [27]Finnish National Board of Education, 2021. Vocational Qualification in Social and Health Care. Available from: https://eperusteet.opintopolku.fi/#/en/ammatillinen/7854765/tiedot (cited 8 January 2025).
  28. [28]Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 13(3), 319–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  29. [29]Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D., 2000. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science. 46(2), 186–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  30. [30]Granić, A., Marangunić, N., 2019. Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology. 50(5), 2572–2593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
  31. [31]Alhonkoski, M., Veermans, M., Artukka, K., et al., 2022. The Perspectives of Healthcare Teachers on Their Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Three-Dimensional Technology: A Mixed Methods Study. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 40(11), 743–753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000876
  32. [32]Al-Qaysi, N., Mohamad-Nordin, N., Al-Emran, M., 2020. Employing the technology acceptance model in social media: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies. 25(6), 4961–5002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10197-1
  33. [33]Finlex, 2017. Vocational Education and Training Act (531/2017). Available from: https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2017/20170531 (cited 8 January 2025). (in Finnish)
  34. [34]National Supervisory Authority for Welfare and Health, 2021. Professional practice rights. Available from: https://www.valvira.fi/web/en/healthcare/professional_practice_rights (cited 8 January 2025). (in Finnish)
  35. [35]Finnish National Board of Research Integrity TENK, 2023. The Ethical Principles of Research with Human Participants and Ethical Review in Human Sciences in Finland. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK: Helsinki, Finland. Available from: https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2021-01/Ethical_review_in_human_sciences_2020.pdf
  36. [36]Sousa, V.D., Rojjanasrirat, W., 2011. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: A clear and user‐friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 17(2), 268–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
  37. [37]Eaton, S.E., 2017. Research Assistant Training Manual: Focus Groups. University of Calgary: Calgary, Alta, Canada. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1880/51811
  38. [38]Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C.J., et al., 2018. The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 9(1), 20–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860
  39. [39]Tausch, A.P., Menold, N., 2016. Methodological Aspects of Focus Groups in Health Research: Results of Qualitative Interviews With Focus Group Moderators. Global Qualitative Nursing Research. 3, 2333393616630466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393616630466
  40. [40]Moseholm, E., Fetters, M.D., 2017. Conceptual models to guide integration during analysis in convergent mixed methods studies. Methodological Innovations. 10(2), 2059799117703118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799117703118
  41. [41]Assarroudi, A., Heshmati Nabavi, F., Armat, M.R., et al., 2018. Directed qualitative content analysis: The description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. Journal of Research in Nursing. 23(1), 42–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987117741667
  42. [42]Graneheim, U.H., Lundman, B., 2004. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today. 24(2), 105–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
  43. [43]Lindgren, B.-M., Lundman, B., Graneheim, U.H., 2020. Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 108, 103632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632
  44. [44]Liaw, S.Y., Choo, T., Wu, L.T., et al., 2021. Wow, woo, win—Healthcare students’ and facilitators’ experiences of interprofessional simulation in three-dimensional virtual world: A qualitative evaluation study. Nurse Education Today. 105, 105018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105018
  45. [45]Courtney-Pratt, H., Levett-Jones, T., Lapkin, S., et al., 2015. Development and psychometric testing of the satisfaction with Cultural Simulation Experience Scale. Nurse Education in Practice. 15(6), 530–536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2015.07.009
  46. [46]Foronda, C.L., Shubeck, K., Swoboda, S.M., et al., 2016. Impact of Virtual Simulation to Teach Concepts of Disaster Triage. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 12(4), 137–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.02.004
  47. [47]Saab, M.M., Landers, M., Egan, S., et al., 2021. Nurses and Nursing Students’ Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding the Use of Technology in Patient Care: A Mixed-Method Systematic Review. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 39(11), 704–713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000791
  48. [48]Raghunathan, K., McKenna, L., Peddle, M., 2022. Utilisation of academic electronic medical records in pre-registration nurse education: A descriptive study. Collegian. 29(5), 645–653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2022.03.005
  49. [49]Sarver, W., Cichra, N., Kline, M., 2015. Perceived Benefits, Motivators, and Barriers to Advancing Nurse Education: Removing Barriers to Improve Success: Nursing Education Perspectives. 36(3), 153–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5480/14-1407
  50. [50]Farra, S.L., Smith, S.J., Ulrich, D.L., 2018. The Student Experience With Varying Immersion Levels of Virtual Reality Simulation. Nursing Education Perspectives. 39(2), 99–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000258
  51. [51]Vaughn, J., Lister, M., Shaw, R.J., 2016. Piloting Augmented Reality Technology to Enhance Realism in Clinical Simulation. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 34(9), 402–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000251
  52. [52]Lee, J., Chang, S.H., 2021. Video-Based Learning: Recommendations for Physical Educators. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 92(2), 3–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2021.1854018
  53. [53]Mikkonen, K., Koskinen, M., Koskinen, C., et al., 2019. Qualitative study of social and healthcare educators’ perceptions of their competence in education. Health & Social Care in the Community. 27(6), 1555–1563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12827
  54. [54]Gallegos, C., Tesar, A.J., Connor, K., et al., 2017. The use of a game-based learning platform to engage nursing students: A descriptive, qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice. 27, 101–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.08.019
  55. [55]Holla, M., Berg, M.V.D., 2022. Virtual reality techniques for trauma education. Injury. 53, S64–S68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.067
  56. [56]Simón-Vicente, L., Rodríguez-Cano, S., Delgado-Benito, V., et al., 2024. Cybersickness. A systematic literature review of adverse effects related to virtual reality. Neurología. 39(8), 701–709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrl.2022.04.009
  57. [57]Altarteer, S., Charissis, V., 2019. Technology Acceptance Model for 3D Virtual Reality System in Luxury Brands Online Stores. IEEE Access. 7, 64053–64062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916353
  58. [58]Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L., 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

How to Cite

Mika Alhonkoski, Marjaana Veermans, Hanna Nurmi, Sari Kotonen, Kalle Artukka, Leena Salminen. Technology Acceptance of 3D Technologies among Practical Nursing Students: A Mixed-Methods Study. Innovations in Pedagogy and Technology. 23 February 2026. https://doi.org/10.63385/ipt.v2i2.329
Citation formats

Copyright & License

Copyright © 2026 Mika Alhonkoski, Marjaana Veermans, Hanna Nurmi, Sari Kotonen, Kalle Artukka, Leena Salminen. Published by Nature and Information Engineering Publishing Sdn. Bhd..

This journal publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Authors retain copyright. Accepted manuscripts are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Reuse is permitted under the terms of the license with proper attribution to the original source.

Article Metrics

562Abstract views
439Downloads