Abstract

This article examines family–school interaction and its impact on the cognitive performance of students at Malema-Sede Primary School, Mozambique. A mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative strategies, was employed to provide a comprehensive and contextually grounded understanding of the phenomenon. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with parents, teachers, and school administrators; structured questionnaires; participant observation during meetings and school events; and documentary analysis of performance reports and institutional records. The sample comprised 30 parents, 10 teachers, and 4 administrators. Results indicate substantial parental involvement in pedagogical meetings and celebratory events, but low participation in extracurricular activities, such as reading workshops and sports projects. School–family communication received mixed evaluations: some respondents rated it as good/excellent, while others considered it fair/unsatisfactory, highlighting weaknesses in formal communication channels. Statistical analyses revealed a positive correlation between parental involvement and student performance (r = 0.68; p < 0.05) and significant differences among students with varying levels of family engagement (ANOVA: F = 4.32; p < 0.05). Documentary evidence confirms that, although policies promoting parental involvement exist, their practical implementation is inconsistent. The study concludes that family participation supports learning and socio-emotional development, albeit constrained by structural and contextual barriers. Recommendations include enhancing communication strategies, strengthening school governance, and diversifying opportunities for continuous family engagement.

Keywords

Cognitive DevelopmentFamily–School RelationshipParental InvolvementSchool Communication

References

  1. [1] Dermott, E., Fowler, T., 2020. What Is a Family and Why Does It Matter? Social Sciences. 9(5), 83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9050083
  2. [2] Adler, M.A., Lenz, K. (Eds.), 2023. The Changing Faces of Families: Diverse Family Forms in Various Policy Contexts. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003193500
  3. [3] Seltzer, J.A., 2019. Family Change and Changing Family Demography. Demography. 56(2), 405–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-019-00766-6
  4. [4] Bronk, K.C., Liechtenstein, H., el Sehity, T., et al., 2024. Family Purpose: An Empirical Investigation of Collective Purpose. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 19(4), 662–674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2023.2254738
  5. [5] Sefton-Green, J., Mannell, K., Erstad, O., 2025. The Platformization of the Family: Towards a Research Agenda. Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74881-3
  6. [6] Savell, S.M., Saini, R., Ramos, M., et al., 2023. Family Processes and Structure: Longitudinal Influences on Adolescent Disruptive and Internalizing Behaviors. Family Relations. 72(1), 361–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12728
  7. [7] Assembly of the Republic, 2004. Family Law (Law No. 10/2004 of 25 August). Assembly of the Republic: Maputo, Mozambique. Available from: https://www.wlsa.org.mz/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Lei_da_Familia.pdf (in Portuguese)
  8. [8] Ben‑Arieh, A., Casas, F., Frønes, I., et al. (Eds.), 2014. Handbook of Child Well‑Being: Theories, Methods and Policies in Global Perspective. Springer + Business Media Dordrecht: Dordrecht, Netherlands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8
  9. [9] Caffagni, C.W.A., 2024. What is the social function of the school? Reflections of social and political nuances regarding the school institution. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação. 32(122), e0244250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362024003204250 (in Portuguese)
  10. [10] Gawryszewski, B., Hastenreiter, T., 2023. The Social Function of Normal Schools in the Present Time. Revista Labor. 1(27), 456–464. (in Portuguese)
  11. [11] Fabregat, K.R., 2022. The Social Function of the School as a Path to Achieving Quality Education, from the Teacher's Perspective [Master’s Thesis]. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo: São Paulo, Brazil. Available from: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/30834 (in Portuguese)
  12. [12] Guzmán Marín, L.L., 2017. The Family. College of Sciences and Humanities, General Directorate, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: Mexico City, Mexico. Available from: https://www.cch.unam.mx/padres/sites/www.cch.unam.mx.padres/files/archivos/La-familia-completo.pdf (in Spanish)
  13. [13] Asare, F., Antwi, V.E. 2025. The impact of school socialization on the academic achievements in social studies at Kokote M/A Grade Seven. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS). 9(10), 9014–9037. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000734
  14. [14] Freire, P., 2005. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc: New York, NY, USA.
  15. [15] UNESCO. 2023. Bringing into Focus the Future of the Right to Education: How Should the Right to Education Evolve? United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, France.
  16. [16] Bélanger, P., 2010. Theories in Adult Learning and Education. Verlag Barbara Budrich: Berlin, Germany. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3224/86649362
  17. [17] Durkheim, E., 1956. Education and Sociology, 4th ed. Sherwood, D.F. (Trans.). Free Press: New York, NY, USA.
  18. [18] Tlili, A., Burgos, D., Huang, R., et al., 2023. Are open educational resources (OER) and practices (OEP) effective in improving learning achievement? A meta-analysis and research synthesis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00424-3
  19. [19] Simbo, C., 2025. Exploring the purpose and evolution of education: From informal learning to formal schooling, challenges, international legal frameworks and recommendations for the future. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science. 14(2), 309–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v14i2.3920
  20. [20] Eustace, R.W., Nyamhanga, T.M., Ghuhiya, A.I., et al., 2018. Family life education development, implementation and evaluation in Tanzania. In: Robila, M., Taylor, A.C., (Eds.). Global Perspectives on Family Life Education. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 135–151. Available from: https://research.wright.edu/en/publications/family-life-education-development-implementation-and-evaluation-i/
  21. [21] Oliveira, N.H.D., 2009. Restarting: Family, Children, and Challenges. UNESP Publishing: São Paulo, Brazil. (in Portuguese)
  22. [22] Acharya, S., Mjaya, A., Robinson-Pant, A. (Eds.), 2025. Family and Intergenerational Literacy and Learning: International Perspectives. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning: Hamburg, Germany. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000393131
  23. [23] Marah, K., Fute, A., Kangwa, D., 2025. Beyond the classroom: Examining the varied impact of family dynamics on students’ academic success. Acta Psychologica. 255, 104895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104895
  24. [24] Holloway, S.L., Pimlott-Wilson, H., 2019. Schools, families and social reproduction. In: Jahnke, H., Kramer, C., Meusburger, P. (Eds.). Geographies of Schooling. Knowledge and Space, Vol. 14. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 281–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18799-6_14
  25. [25] Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L., 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
  26. [26] Patton, M.Q., 2015. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 4th ed. SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
  27. [27] Denzin, N.K., 2017. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Routledge: London, UK.
  28. [28] Braun, V., Clarke, V., 2019. Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. 11(4), 589–597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  29. [29] Santana, R.C.B.d., Paiva Júnior, F.G.d., 2022. Methodological triangulation in qualitative research: A study in Brazilian journals focused on tourism. Brazilian Journal of Scientific Administration. 13(1), 67–81. Available from: https://sustenere.inf.br/index.php/rbadm/article/view/6798
  30. [30] Arias, C., Meneses, E., Berrío, M., 2023. Family–School Collaboration and Academic Achievement: A Mixed-Methods Study in Latin American Schools. Frontiers in Education. 8, 1184.
  31. [31] Fan, X., Chen, M., 2020. Parental Involvement and Students’ Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. 13, 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009048817385
  32. [32] Martin, M., Lachman, J., Wamoyi, J., et al., 2021. A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the large-scale implementation of a School- and Community-Based Parenting Program to reduce violence against children in Tanzania: A Study Protocol. Implementation Science Communications. 2(52). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00154-5

How to Cite

Dionísio Ernesto Tomás, Nurdine Aiuba Daúda. Contemporary Challenges in Education: A Study on School–Family Interaction in the Primary Education Context of Malema-Sede, Mozambique. Innovations in Pedagogy and Technology. 28 October 2026. https://doi.org/10.63385/ipt.v2i4.100861
Citation formats

Copyright & License

Copyright © 2026 Dionísio Ernesto Tomás, Nurdine Aiuba Daúda. Published by Nature and Information Engineering Publishing Sdn. Bhd..

This journal publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Authors retain copyright. Accepted manuscripts are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Reuse is permitted under the terms of the license with proper attribution to the original source.

Article Metrics

1,085Abstract views
444Downloads