Abstract

Speaking from an intersectional perspective, the personality of EFL instructors influences the development of personality-specific teaching styles. As such, research has explored the relationship between the personalities of EFL (English as a Foreign Language) teachers and various teaching variables. However, the developmental aspect of EFL teachers' intra-personal negotiations has been overlooked in previous research, despite the potential that tracking teachers’ personality (re)constructions can offer a critical understanding of pre-service EFL teachers’ evolution over time into effective in-service EFL pedagogues. To address this gap, this study employed a narrative approach to gain insight into a single EFL teacher's retrospective understanding of how their personality evolved over their pre-service and in-service teaching career with the pursuit of becoming an effective communicative EFL teacher. Data was gathered through a self-reported personality document, a written narrative, and two rounds of semi-structured interviews. The data were then analyzed using qualitative data mining and coding techniques. The study found that some pre-service personality traits of EFL teachers act as obstacles to becoming effective EFL teachers. However, over about five years, cultural, pedagogical, and professional factors as some compelling drivers lead to EFL teachers' intra-personality negotiations, resulting in their gradual evolution into effective communicative pedagogues. The study also concludes that methodologically, a narrative approach to capturing the longitudinal psychosocial transformations of EFL teachers can offer valuable insights into the dynamics of EFL teacher development.

Keywords

Communicative PedagogyEFLNegotiated SelfPersonality NegotiationTeacher Personality

References

  1. [1]Symonds, P.M., 1954. Teaching as a Function of the Teacher’s Personality. Journal of Teacher Education. 5(1), 79–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002248715400500107
  2. [2]Walberg, H.J., 1967. Teacher Personality and Classroom Climate. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED014471.pdf (cited 30 July 2025).
  3. [3] Rushton, S., Morgan, J., Richard, M., 2007. Teacher’s Myers-Briggs Personality Profiles: Identifying Effective Teacher Personality Traits. Teaching and Teacher Education. 23(4), 432–441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.011
  4. [4]Kell, H.J., 2019. Do Teachers’ Personality Traits Predict Their Performance? A Comprehensive Review of the Empirical Literature From 1990 to 2018. ETS Research Report Series. 2019(1), 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12241
  5. [5]Shakeel, S., Khan, M.M., Khan, R.A.A., et al., 2022. Linking Personality Traits, Self-Efficacy and Burnout of Teachers in Public Schools: Does School Climate Play a Moderating Role? Public Organization Review. 22(1), 19–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00514-8
  6. [6]Cooper, T.C., 2001. Foreign Language Teaching Style and Personality. Foreign Language Annals. 34(4), 301–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02062.x
  7. [7] Seidlhofer, B., 2005. English as a lingua franca. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
  8. [8]Yu, X., Liu, C., 2022. Teaching English as a Lingua Franca in China: Hindrances and Prospects. English Today. 38(3), 185–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078421000018
  9. [9]Cheraghi, Z., Karamimehr, P., 2022. An Investigation of Multicultural Personality Traits of Iranian High School EFL Learners. Education Research International. 2022, 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7629197
  10. [10]Ünaldı, İ., Bardakci, M., Dolas, F., et al., 2013. The Relationship between Occupational Burnout and Personality Traits of Turkish EFL Teachers. Journal of Education and Practice. 4(13), 86–98. Available from: https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/6779
  11. [11] Kirkagac, S., Öz, H., 2017. The Role of Big Five Personality Traits in Predicting Prospective EFL Teachers' Academic Achievement. Online Submission. 4(4), 317-328. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED577943.pdf
  12. [12]Fadaee, E., Marzban, A., Najafi Karimi, S., 2021. The Relationship Between Autonomy, Second Language Teaching Styles, and Personality Traits: A Case Study of Iranian EFL Teachers. Cogent Education. 8(1), 1881203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1881203
  13. [13] Mahmoudi, T., Zamanian, M., 2018. The Relationship Between Iranian EFL Teachers’ Personality and Their Teaching Preference. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 8(6), 686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0806.20
  14. [14]Rauthmann, J.F. (Ed.)., 2021. The handbook of personality dynamics and processes. Academic Press:Cambridge, UK.
  15. [15]Hang, Y., Soto, C., Lee, B., et al., 2023. Social Expectations and Abilities to Meet Them as Possible Mechanisms of Youth Personality Development. Journal of Personality. 91(3), 601–612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12760
  16. [16]Alam, Md.S., Asmawi, A., 2023. Understanding Identity Salience and English as a Foreign Language Teaching Practices: A Case Study of Multi‐Subject Generalist Teachers. Review of Education. 11(3), e3424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3424
  17. [17]Swann, W.B., 2005. The Self and Identity Negotiation. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems. 6(1), 69–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/is.6.1.06swa
  18. [18]Gelfand, M.J., Major, V.S., Raver, J.L., et al., 2006. Negotiating Relationally: The Dynamics of the Relational Self in Negotiations. Academy of Management Review. 31(2), 427–451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208689
  19. [19]Keating, M.C., 2005. The Person in the Doing: Negotiating the Experience of Self. In: Barton, D., Tusting, K. (Eds.). Beyond Communities of Practice. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 105–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610554.007
  20. [20]Boud, D., 1992. The Use of Self-Assessment Schedules in Negotiated Learning. Studies in Higher Education. 17(2), 185–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079212331382657
  21. [21]McCrae, R.R., John, O.P., 1992. An Introduction to the Five‐Factor Model and Its Applications. Journal of Personality. 60(2), 175–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
  22. [22]Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R., Kay, G.G., 1995. Persons, Places, and Personality: Career Assessment Using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Career Assessment. 3(2), 123–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279500300202
  23. [23] McCrae, R.R., Costa, P. T., 2008. The five-factor theory of personality. In: John, O.P., Robins, R.W.,Pervin, L.A. (Eds.). Handbook of personality: Theory and research. Guilford Press: New York, USA. pp. 159–181.
  24. [24]McCrae, R.R., 2011. Personality Theories for the 21st Century. Teaching of Psychology. 38(3), 209–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311411785
  25. [25]Chen, X., He, J., Swanson, E., et al., 2022. Big Five Personality Traits and Second Language Learning: a Meta-analysis of 40 Years’ Research. Educational Psychology Review. 34(2), 851–887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09641-6
  26. [26]Bahrami, V., Hosseini, M., 2023. Individual Differences in Teacher Research Involvement? Factoring in Language Teachers’ Big Five Personality Traits and Motivation to Conduct Research. Journal of Teacher Education. 74(1), 85–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871221105799
  27. [27]Klassen, R.M., Tze, V.M.C., 2014. Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, Personality, and Teaching Effectiveness: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Research Review. 12, 59–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001
  28. [28]Roloff, J., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., et al., 2020. The Predictive Validity of Teachers’ Personality, Cognitive and Academic Abilities at the End of High School on Instructional Quality in Germany: A Longitudinal Study. AERA Open. 6(1), 2332858419897884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419897884
  29. [29]Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R., 1992. Four Ways Five Factors Are Basic. Personality and Individual Differences. 13(6), 653–665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I
  30. [30]Roloff, J., Kirstges, J., Grund, S., et al., 2022. How Strongly Is Personality Associated With Burnout Among Teachers? A Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review. 34(3), 1613–1650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09672-7
  31. [31]Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., Judge, T.A., 2001. Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 9(1–2), 9–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00160
  32. [32]Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., 1991. The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta‐Analysis. Personnel Psychology. 44(1), 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
  33. [33]Roberts, B.W., 2009. Back to the Future: Personality and Assessment and Personality Development. Journal of Research in Personality. 43(2), 137–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.015
  34. [34]Roberts, B.W., Walton, K.E., Viechtbauer, W., 2006. Personality Traits Change in Adulthood: Reply to Costa and McCrae (2006). Psychological Bulletin. 132(1), 29–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.29
  35. [35]Roberts, B.W., 2018. A Revised Sociogenomic Model of Personality Traits. Journal of Personality. 86(1), 23–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12323
  36. [36]Sutin, A.R., Costa, P.T., Wethington, E., et al., 2010. Turning Points and Lessons Learned: Stressful Life Events and Personality Trait Development Across Middle Adulthood. Psychology and Aging. 25(3), 524–533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018751
  37. [37]Donnellan, M.B., Lucas, R.E., 2008. Age Differences in the Big Five Across the Life Span: Evidence from Two National Samples. Psychology and Aging. 23(3), 558–566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012897
  38. [38]Fuller, F.F., Bown, O.H., 1975. Becoming a Teacher. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 76(6), 25–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146817507600603
  39. [39]Bönke, N., Klusmann, U., Kunter, M., et al., 2024. Long-Term Changes in Teacher Beliefs and Motivation: Progress, Stagnation or Regress? Teaching and Teacher Education. 141, 104489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104489
  40. [40]Aksu, M., Demir, C.E., Daloglu, A., et al., 2010. Who Are the Future Teachers in Turkey? Characteristics of Entering Student Teachers. International Journal of Educational Development. 30(1), 91–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.06.005
  41. [41]Kim, L.E., Poropat, A.E., MacCann, C., 2016. Conscientiousness in Education: Its Conceptualization, Assessment, and Utility. In: Lipnevich, A.A., Preckel, F., Roberts, R.D. (Eds.). Psychosocial Skills and School Systems in the 21st Century, The Springer Series on Human Exceptionality. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 155–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28606-8_7
  42. [42]Terracciano, A., McCrae, R.R., Brant, L.J., et al., 2005. Hierarchical Linear Modeling Analyses of the NEO-PI-R Scales in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Psychology and Aging. 20(3), 493–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.3.493
  43. [43]Hartmann, F.G., Ertl, B., 2023. Big Five Personality Trait Differences Between Students from Different Majors Aspiring to the Teaching Profession. Current Psychology. 42(14), 12070–12086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02528-3
  44. [44]Genoud, P.A., Waroux, E.L., 2021. The Impact of Negative Affectivity on Teacher Burnout. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(24), 13124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413124
  45. [45]Pennington, M.C., Richards, J.C., 2016. Teacher Identity in Language Teaching: Integrating Personal, Contextual, and Professional Factors. RELC Journal. 47(1), 5–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216631219
  46. [46] Stronge, J.H., 2007. Qualities Of Effective Teachers, 2nd ed. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development: Alexandria, VA, USA.
  47. [47] Creemers, B.P.M., Kyriakydes, L., Antoniou, P., 2013. Teacher Professional Development for Improving Quality of Teaching. Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands.
  48. [48]Zhang, Q., Watkins, D., 2007. Conceptions of a Good Tertiary EFL Teacher in China. TESOL Quarterly. 41(4), 781–790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00103.x
  49. [49]Levin, B.B., 2002. Case Studies of Teacher Development: An In-Depth Look at How Thinking About Pedagogy Develops Over Time. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607096
  50. [50] Alzeebaree, Y., Zebari, I., 2021. What Makes an Effective EFL Teacher: High School Students' Perceptions. Asian ESP Journal. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3887039 (cited 16 August 2025).
  51. [51]Alzubi, A.A.F., 2022. What Makes an Effective EFL Teacher From Saudi Preuniversity Students’ Perspective. Journal of Education. 202(4), 507–515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057420988702
  52. [52]Boroujeni, A.A.J., Roohani, A., Hasanimanesh, A., 2015. The Impact of Extroversion and Introversion Personality Types on EFL Learners’ Writing Ability. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 5(1), 212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0501.29
  53. [53]Tian, T., 2022. A Review of the Impact of EFL Teachers’ Affectivity and Surgency and Learners’ Shyness on Their Language Attainment. Frontiers in Psychology. 13, 916432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.916432
  54. [54]Tajeddin, Z., Alemi, M., 2019. Effective Language Teachers as Persons: Exploring Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers' Beliefs. TESL-EJ. 22(4). Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1204608.pdf (cited 16 August 2025).
  55. [55]Murphy, P.K., Delli, L.A.M., Edwards, M.N., 2004. The Good Teacher and Good Teaching: Comparing Beliefs of Second-Grade Students, Preservice Teachers, and Inservice Teachers. The Journal of Experimental Education. 72(2), 69–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.72.2.69-92
  56. [56]Richards, J.C., 2010. Competence and Performance in Language Teaching. RELC Journal. 41(2), 101–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210372953
  57. [57] Wiens, P.D., Ruday, S., 2014. Personality and Preservice Teachers: Does it Change, does it Matter? Issues in TeacherEducation. 22(2), 7–27. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1065190.pdf (cited 16 August 2025).
  58. [58]Helson, R., Jones, C., Kwan, V.S.Y., 2002. Personality Change Over 40 Years of Adulthood: Hierarchical Linear Modeling Analyses of Two Longitudinal Samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 83(3), 752–766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.752
  59. [59] Ripski, M.B., LoCasale-Crouch, J., Decker, L., 2011. Pre-service Teachers: Dispositional Traits, Emotional States, and Quality Of Teacher-Student Interactions. Teacher Education Quarterly. 38(2), 77–96. Available from: https://www.teqjournal.org/TEQ%20Website/Back%20Issues/Volume%2038/VOL38%20PDFS/38_2/11ripskietal.pdf
  60. [60]Craig, C.J., 2011. Narrative Inquiry in Teaching and Teacher Education. In: Kitchen, J., Ciuffetelli Parker, D., Pushor, D. (Eds.). Advances in Research on Teaching. Emerald Group Publishing Limited: London, UK. pp. 19–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3687(2011)00000130005
  61. [61]Kitchen, J., 2005. Looking Backward, Moving Forward: Understanding my Narrative as a Teacher Educator. Studying Teacher Education. 1(1), 17–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17425960500039835
  62. [62]Kaasila, R., 2007. Using Narrative Inquiry for Investigating the Becoming of a Mathematics Teacher. ZDM. 39(3), 205–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0023-6
  63. [63]George, A.M., 2008. Learning Teacher: Reviewing the Narrative of a Teacher’s Journey. Contemporary Education Dialogue. 5(2), 292–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0973184913411172
  64. [64]Asmawi, A., Alam, Md.S., 2025. A Utopic Techno-Teacher Coupling: Designing an Ad Hoc Activity Map Towards Transformative Pedagogical Prototypes for Reading Instruction. Discover Education. 4(1), 204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00585-5
  65. [65]Alam, Md.S., Asmawi, A., Fatema, S., 2025. Reflective Narratives as Qualitative Data: A Fundamental Understanding. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities. 5(4), 57–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.5.4.9
  66. [66]Alam, Md.S., Asmawi, A., 2024. Qualitative Research: Defining Features and Guiding Principles. Forum for Education Studies. 2(2), 1262.
  67. [67]Alam, Md.S., Asmawi, A., Fatema, S., 2025. Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) for Qualitative and Mixed-Method Approaches: Principles, Applications, and Key Considerations. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities. 5(4), 51–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.5.4.8
  68. [68]Thurmond, V.A., 2001. The Point of Triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 33(3), 253–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.x
  69. [69]Romero, C., Ventura, S., 2013. Data Mining in Education. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 3(1), 12–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1075
  70. [70]Sandelowski, M., 1998. Writing a Good Read: Strategies for Re-Presenting Qualitative Data. Research in Nursing & Health. 21(4), 375–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199808)21:4<375::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-C
  71. [71] Grbich, C., 2012. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Introduction. SAGE: London, UK.
  72. [72]Elliott, V., 2018. Thinking about the Coding Process in Qualitative Data Analysis. The Qualitative Report. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3560
  73. [73] Williams, M., Moser, T., 2019. The Art of Coding and Thematic Exploration in Qualitative Research. Int’l Management Review. 15(1), 45–55. Available from: http://www.imrjournal.org/uploads/1/4/2/8/14286482/imr-v15n1art4.pdf (cited 16 August 2025).
  74. [74]Robins, R.W., Fraley, R.C., Roberts, B.W., et al., 2001. A Longitudinal Study of Personality Change in Young Adulthood. Journal of Personality. 69(4), 617–640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.694157
  75. [75]Alam, M.S., Asmawi, A., Haque, M.H., et al., 2023. An Appreciation of the EFL Teacher Model in Bangladesh: A Content Analysis of Job Advertisements. The International Journal of Diversity in Education. 24(1), 41–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0020/CGP/v24i01/41-64
  76. [76]Klassen, R.M., 2019. A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Teacher Personality on Teacher Effectiveness and Burnout. Educational Psychology Review. 31(1), 163–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9458-2

How to Cite

Md. Saiful Alam, Adelina Asmawi, Md. Mohib Ullah, Mohammad Hamidul Haque, Md. Nurullah Patwary, Sayeda Fatema, Humayra Akter. Negotiated Selves: Mapping EFL Teachers’ Personality Trajectories for Communicative Pedagogy. Innovations in Pedagogy and Technology. 18 October 2026. https://doi.org/10.63385/ipt.v2i4.100758
Citation formats

Copyright & License

Copyright © 2026 Md. Saiful Alam, Adelina Asmawi, Md. Mohib Ullah, Mohammad Hamidul Haque, Md. Nurullah Patwary, Sayeda Fatema, Humayra Akter. Published by Nature and Information Engineering Publishing Sdn. Bhd..

This journal publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Authors retain copyright. Accepted manuscripts are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Reuse is permitted under the terms of the license with proper attribution to the original source.

Article Metrics

574Abstract views
466Downloads