Abstract

Grounded in a socio‑cultural perspective, this mixed‑methods study examines the barriers that inhibit L2 English university students in Qatar from engaging effectively in academic research. We surveyed 87 students and conducted 20 semi-structured interviews, identifying four interrelated challenging domains: affective and psychological pressures, cognitive and organisational constraints, methodological unfamiliarity, and challenges in academic writing and documentation. These obstacles are shaped by the interplay of institutional infrastructures, instructional practices, and individual learner dispositions. In response, we recommend three evidence-based interventions: targeted time-management workshops to strengthen organisational and planning skills; expanded access to academic resources tailored to learners’ cultural and linguistic backgrounds; and the systematic incorporation of culturally responsive teaching strategies within research-focused courses. Moreover, our findings underscore the need for affective support to address anxiety and self-efficacy concerns, as well as structured tools to remedy planning and time-management gaps. Additionally, step-by-step methodological modules and specialised writing consultations are required to address citation and documentation issues. These insights can inform university policy toward creating scaffolded research education environments that cater to diverse student needs. By implementing these interventions and aligning curriculum design with socio-cultural principles, institutions can foster inclusive research cultures and enhance retention and success among linguistically diverse students through targeted training, collaborative support networks, and evidence-based evaluation.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Hyland, K., 2006. English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book. Routledge: London.
  2. [2] Ahmed, A., Myhill, D., 2016. The impact of the socio-cultural context on L2 English writing of Egyptian university students. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. 11, 117–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.07.004
  3. [3] Williams, J., Ahmed, A.M., Bamigbade, W.A., 2018. Writing centers in higher education institutions in Qatar: A critical review. In: Barnawi, O.Z. (ed.). Writing Centers in the Higher Education Landscape of the Arabian Gulf. Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 41–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55366-5_3
  4. [4] Ahmed, A., Troudi, S., 2018. Exploring EFL writing assessment in an Egyptian university context: Teachers and students’ perspectives. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 9(6), 1229–1242. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0906.12
  5. [5] Ahmed, A.M., 2020. Feedback in EFL writing: Arab world contexts, issues, and challenges. In: Ahmed, A.M., Troudi, S., Riley, S. (eds.). Feedback in L2 English Writing in the Arab World: Inside the Black Box. Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25830-6_1
  6. [6] Li, G., Chen, W., Duanmu, J.L., 2010. Determinants of international students’ academic performance: A comparison between Chinese and other international students. Journal of Studies in International Education. 14(4), 389–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315309331490
  7. [7] Delamont, S., 2011. Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Studies in Higher Education. 36(4), 505–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.586505
  8. [8] Tardy, C.M., 2025. Teaching Second Language Academic Writing. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
  9. [9] Fetters, M.D., Tajima, C., 2022. Joint displays of integrated data collection in mixed methods research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 21, 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221104564
  10. [10] Man, J., Zhan, J., 2023. Ensuring sustainable academic development of L2 postgraduate students and MA programs: Challenges and support in thesis writing for L2 Chinese postgraduate students. Sustainability. 15(19), 14435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914435
  11. [11] Bitchener, J., 2017. Creating an effective argument in different academic genres: A scaffolded approach. In: Teaching Writing for Academic Purposes to Multilingual Students. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 84–98.
  12. [12] Lillis, T., Curry, M.J., 2010. Academic Writing in a Global Context: The Politics and Practices of Publishing in English. Routledge: London, UK.
  13. [13] Magaba, V., 2023. English writing challenges of first-year students: A case study of a university in the Eastern Cape. Athens Journal of Philology. 10(1), 35–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30958/ajp.10-1-2
  14. [14] Rahnuma, N., 2023. Exploring ESL students’ experiences of academic writing in higher education: A cultural–historical activity theory perspective. Education Inquiry, 16(3), 303–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2222450
  15. [15] Ma, L.P.F., 2019. Academic writing support through individual consultations: EAL doctoral student experiences and evaluation. Journal of Second Language Writing. 43, 72–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.11.006
  16. [16] Wang, C., Zhu, S., Dai, Y., 2025. The interplay of Anxiety, Motivation, and Engagement in L2 Writing: A Cross-Sectional Study of CSL Learners. SAGE Open. 15(2), 21582440251341040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251341040
  17. [17] Canagarajah, S., 2012. Translingual Practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations. Routledge: London, UK.
  18. [18] Cole, M., Engeström, Y., Vasquez, O.C., 1997. Mind, Culture and Activity: Seminal Papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
  19. [19] Cotterall, S., 2011. Doctoral students writing: Where’s the pedagogy? Teaching in Higher Education. 16(4), 413–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.560381
  20. [20] Connor, U., 2011. Intercultural Rhetoric in the Writing Classroom. University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.3488851
  21. [21] Hyland, K., 2019. Second Language Writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
  22. [22] Booth, A., Sutton, A., Clowes, M., et al., 2021. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications: London, UK.
  23. [23] Creswell, J.W., Creswell, J.D., 2018. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
  24. [24] Swales, J.M., Feak, C., 2012. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills (3rd ed.). University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  25. [25] Hyland, K., 2004. Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. 13(2), 133–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
  26. [26] Ferris, D., 2009. Teaching College Writing to Diverse Student Populations. University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  27. [27] Thompson, G., 2001. Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics. 22(1), 58–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.58
  28. [28] Tran, L.T., 2014. International Student Adaptation to Academic Writing in Higher Education. Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  29. [29] Hyland, K., 2009. Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. Continuum International Publishing Group: London, UK.
  30. [30] Montgomery, J.L., Baker, W., 2007. Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language Writing. 16(2), 82–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.04.002
  31. [31] Gkonou, C., Daubney, M., Dewaele, J.M., 2017. New Insights into Language Anxiety: Theory, Research and Educational Implications. Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK.
  32. [32] Bandura, A., 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman: New York, NY, USA.
  33. [33] Zimmerman, B.J., 2000. Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 25(1), 82–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
  34. [34] Kiley, M., Wisker, G., 2009. Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development. 28(4), 431–441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903067930
  35. [35] Manathunga, C., 2012. Supervisors watching supervisors: The deconstructive possibilities and tensions of team supervision. The Australian Universities’ Review. 54(1), 29–37.
  36. [36] Lantolf, J.P., Thorne, S.L., 2006. Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford University Press. 28(3), 477–480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm027
  37. [37] Hyland, K., 2004. Genre and Second Language Writing. University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23927
  38. [38] Ferris, D.R., Hedgcock, J.S., 2013. Teaching L2 Composition: Purpose, Process, and Practice. 3rd ed. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813003
  39. [39] Villamil, O.S., De Guerrero, M.C.M., 1996. Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing. 5(1), 51–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90015-6
  40. [40] Storch, N., 2005. Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing. 14(3), 153–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
  41. [41] Mackiewicz, J., Thompson, I., 2014. Talk About Writing: The Tutoring Strategies of Experienced Writing Center Tutors. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315768595
  42. [42] Williams, J., Ahmed, A.M., Bamigbade, W.A., 2018. Writing centers in higher education institutions in Qatar: A critical review. In: Barnawi, O.Z. (ed.). Writing Centers in the Higher Education Landscape of the Arabian Gulf. Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland. 41–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55366-5_3
  43. [43] Thiry, H., Laursen, S.L., 2011. The role of student–advisor interactions in apprenticing undergraduate researchers into a scientific community of practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 20(6), 771–784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9271-2
  44. [44] Sambunjak, D., Straus, S.E., Marušić, A., 2006. Mentoring in academic medicine: A systematic review. JAMA. 296(9), 1103–1115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.9.1103
  45. [45] Regehr, C., Glancy, D., Pitts, A., 2013. Interventions to reduce stress in university students: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders. 148(1), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.026
  46. [46] Walton, G.M., Cohen, G.L., 2011. A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science. 331(6023), 1447–1451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198364
  47. [47] Lave, J., Wenger, E., 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
  48. [48] Healey, M., Jenkins, A., 2009. Developing Undergraduate Research and Inquiry. Higher Education Academy: York, UK.
  49. [49] Levy, P., Petrulis, R., 2012. How do first-year university students experience inquiry and research, and what are the implications for the practice of inquiry-based learning? Studies in Higher Education. 37(1), 85–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.499166
  50. [50] Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., et al., 2018. A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching. 51(1), 36–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350
  51. [51] Almutairy, A.H., 2024. Exploring the relationship between self-efficacy and second language writing anxiety among Saudi EFL students: A correlational study [Master’s Thesis]. Majmaah University: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Available from: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/th.311 (cited 05 August 2025).
  52. [52] Ganapathy, M., Kaur, M., Jamal, M., et al., 2022. The effect of a genre-based pedagogical approach on Orang Asli students’ EFL writing performance. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction. 19(1), 85–113. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1333722 (cited 05 August 2025).
  53. [53] Hughes, B., Zhang, J., 2025. English writing centers in China: Opportunities, challenges, and paths forward. Writing Center Journal. 43(1), Article 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/2832-9414.1993
  54. [54] Vygotsky, L.S., 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
  55. [55] Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L., 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
  56. [56] Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Turner, L.A., 2007. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 1(2), 112–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
  57. [57] Tavakol, M., Dennick, R., 2011. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education. 2, 53–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
  58. [58] Patton, M.Q., 2015. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (4th ed.). SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
  59. [59] Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G., 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE: Newbury Park, CA, USA.
  60. [60] Shenton, A.K., 2004. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information. 22(2), 63–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
  61. [61] Field, A., 2018. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE: London, UK.
  62. [62] Braun, V., Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3(2), 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  63. [63] British Educational Research Association, 2024. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research (5th ed.). BERA: London. Available from: https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-fifth-edition-2024.
  64. [64] Hopkyns, S., 2022. Cultural and linguistic struggles and solidarities of Emirati learners in online classes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Policy Futures in Education. 20(7), 706–723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103211024815
  65. [65] Al-Jayyousi, G.F., Shraim, M., O’Hara, L., et al., 2025. Mental health of university students: A cross-sectional study from Qatar. Scientific Reports. 15(1), 36237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20202-7
  66. [66] Yan, K., Berliner, D.C., 2013. Chinese international students’ personal and sociocultural stressors in the United States. Journal of College Student Development. 54(1), 62–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2013.0010
  67. [67] Orebi, H.A., Shahin, A.A., Hefzy, E.M., 2023. Medical students’ perceptions, experiences, and barriers towards research implementation at the Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University. BMC Medical Education. 23(1), 902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04884-z
  68. [68] Al-Najdi, S., Mansoor, A., Al Hayk, O., et al., 2025. Silent struggles: A qualitative study exploring mental health challenges of undergraduate healthcare students. BMC Medical Education. 25, 157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06740-8
  69. [69] Maharaj, R., Ndwiga, D., Chutiyami, M., 2025. Mental health and wellbeing of international students in Australia: A systematic review. Journal of Mental Health. 34(4), 431–449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2024.2390393
  70. [70] Bendriss, R., Saliba, R., Birch, S., 2015. Faculty and librarians’ partnership: Designing a new framework to develop information-fluent future doctors. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 41(6), 821–838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.09.003
  71. [71] Wingate, U., 2015. Academic Literacy and Student Diversity: The Case for Inclusive Practice. Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK.
  72. [72] Regehr, C., Glancy, D., Pitts, A., 2013. Interventions to reduce stress in university students: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders. 148(1), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.026
  73. [73] Byars-Winston, A., Leverett, P., Pfund, C., et al., 2023. A randomized controlled trial of an intervention to increase culturally aware mentorship. Science Advances. 9(7), eadf9705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adf9705

How to Cite

Abdelhamid M. Ahmed, Lameya M. Rezk, Nasser F. Al-Dosari. Barriers and Bridges: L2 English Research Challenges and Pedagogical Interventions. Innovations in Pedagogy and Technology. 12 October 2026. https://doi.org/10.63385/ipt.v2i4.100679
Citation formats

Copyright & License

Copyright © 2026 Abdelhamid M. Ahmed, Lameya M. Rezk, Nasser F. Al-Dosari. Published by Nature and Information Engineering Publishing Sdn. Bhd..

This journal publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Authors retain copyright. Accepted manuscripts are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Reuse is permitted under the terms of the license with proper attribution to the original source.

Article Metrics

605Abstract views
419Downloads