Abstract

This study investigates the pedagogical impact of partnership work through implementing Ketso workshops in a Master of Public Health program. The research explores the experiences of facilitators and alums who return to co-lead interactive sessions focused on developing systematic review protocols. By engaging these past students in peer-led workshops, the project aims to understand how their role as facilitators contributes to their academic growth, skill development, and professional identity. Using a qualitative, thematic analysis of focus group data, the study captures insights into how peer partnership enhances critical thinking, communication, and leadership skills. The workshops provided were to ensure a collaborative learning environment was developed for the participants to build their confidence and share their ideas on their research. Thus, fostering an inclusive and empowering environment for the students. Whereby they can learn from the previous cohort, the student partners. Findings indicate that student-led sessions strengthen peer learning and promote facilitator growth in confidence, leadership, and reflective practice. The study supports the value of peer partnerships as an effective pedagogical strategy in higher education. By analysing the student partners' experience, it was established that they gained transferable skills, such as time management, problem solving, and felt they were able to support fellow students with their Ketso research project. These skills will then be beneficial for their future career. Overall, the study demonstrated that the student partners were adaptable to the student needs, demonstrating professionalism.

Keywords

KetsoPublic HealthStudent PartnersStudent PartnershipWorkshops

References

  1. [1] Wang, T., Li, L.Y., 2008. Understanding International Postgraduate Research Students' Challenges and Pedagogical Needs in Thesis Writing. International Journal of Pedagogies & Learning. 4(3), 88–96.
  2. [2] Pillay, R., Laeequddin, M., 2019. Peer Teaching: A Pedagogic Method for Higher Education. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering. 9(1), 2907–2913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.a9106.119119
  3. [3] Lowe, T., El Hakim, Y. (Eds.), 2019. A Handbook for Student Engagement in Higher Education: Theory into Practice. Routledge: London, UK.
  4. [4] Williamson, S.N., Paulsen-Becejac, L., 2018. The Impact of Peer Learning within a Group of International Post-Graduate Students – A Pilot Study. Athens Journal of Education. 5(1), 7–27.
  5. [5] Carlson, E., Stenberg, M., Lai, T., et al., 2019. Nursing Students’ Perceptions of Peer Learning through Cross‐Cultural Student‐Led Webinars: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 75(7), 1518–1526.
  6. [6] Hernández Coliñir, J., Molina Gallardo, L., González Morales, D., et al., 2022. Characteristics and Impacts of Peer Assisted Learning in University Studies in Health Science: A Systematic Review. Revista Clínica Española. 222(1), 44–53.
  7. [7] Zhang, H., Liao, A.W.X., Goh, S.H., et al., 2022. Effectiveness of Peer Review of Peer Teaching in Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nurse Education Today. 118, 105499.
  8. [8] Suyo-Vega, J.A., Fernández-Bedoya, V.H., Meneses-La-Riva, M.E., 2024. Beyond Traditional Teaching: A Systematic Review of Innovative Pedagogical Practices in Higher Education. F1000Research. 13, 22.
  9. [9] Stigmar, M., 2016. Peer-to-Peer Teaching in Higher Education: A Critical Literature Review. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning. 24(2), 124–136.
  10. [10] Green, W., 2019. Engaging “Students as Partners” in Global Learning: Some Possibilities and Provocations. Journal of International and Comparative Education. 23(1), 10–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315318814266
  11. [11] Chrisovalsntis, K., Skordoulis, C., Drigas, A., 2025. A Systematic Review of Mind Maps, STEM Education, Algorithmic and Procedural Learning. Computers. 14(6), 204.
  12. [12] Furlong, C., Tippett, J., 2011. Returning Knowledge Back to Bellavista Nanay: A Researcher’s Perspective. In Proceedings of the 35th WEDC International Conference, Loughborough, UK, 19–21 July 2011; pp. 1–4.
  13. [13] Bates, J.S., 2016. Ketso: A New Tool for Extension Professionals. The Journal of Extension. 54(1), 3.
  14. [14] Vygotsky, L.S., 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
  15. [15] Tippett, J., 2011. Ketso® Guide. Available from: https://www.communityplanning.net/pub-film/pdf/Ketso_User_Guide_Aug_2011.pdf (cited 1 August 2025).
  16. [16] Healey, M., Flint, A., Harrington, K., 2014. Engagement Through Partnership: Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. Higher Education Academy: York, UK. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264240134
  17. [17] Dunne, E., Owen, D. (Eds.), 2013. The Student Engagement Handbook: Practice in Higher Education. Emerald: Bingley, UK. pp. 367–378.
  18. [18] Bovill, C., 2013. An Investigation of Co-Created Curricula within Higher Education in the UK, Ireland, and the USA. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 51(1), 15–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.770264
  19. [19] McCulloch, A., 2009. The Student as Co-Producer: Learning from Public Administration about the Student–University Relationship. Studies in Higher Education. 34(2), 171–183. Available from: https://sdf.ac.uk/cms/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/hertsstudentascoproducer.pdf
  20. [20] Alabbasi, D., Stelma, J., 2018. Using Ketso in Qualitative Research with Female Saudi Teachers. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 19(2). Available from: https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2930/4219
  21. [21] Harrison, K., Barlow, J.H., 1995. Focused Group Discussion: A “Quality” Method for Health Research? Health Psychology Update. 20, 11–13. Available from: https://pureportal.coventry.ac.uk/en/publications/focused-group-discussion-a-quality-method-for-health-research-2/
  22. [22] Won, M.-R., Choi, Y.-J., 2017. Undergraduate Nursing Student Mentors’ Experiences of Peer Mentoring in Korea: A Qualitative Analysis. Nurse Education Today. 51, 8–14.
  23. [23] Ford, N., Thackeray, C., Barnes, P.,et al., 2015. Peer Learning Leaders: Developing Employability through Facilitating the Learning of Other Students. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. Special Edition: Academic Peer Learning. Available from: https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/23009/1/373-1828-1-PB.pdf
  24. [24] Hinchliffe, G.W., Jolly, A., 2011. Graduate Identity and Employability. British Educational Research Journal. 37(4), 563–584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.482200
  25. [25] Willocks, K., Rouse, J., 2024. Developing Leaders Online Using Action Learning: An Account of Practice. Action Learning: Research and Practice. 21(2), 174–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2024.2359239
  26. [26] Rawson, R., Rhodes, C., 2022. Peer-Assisted Learning Online: Peer Leader Motivations and Experiences. Journal of Peer Learning. 15, 32–47. Available from: https://journalofpeerlearning.org/articles/105/files/66951d90e5743.pdf
  27. [27] Blegur, J., Wasak, M.R.P., Rosari, R., 2019. Student’s Self-Confidence Restoration with Peer Mentoring Strategy. European Scientific Journal. 15(19), 129–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2019.v15n19p129
  28. [28] Reddy, M.M., 2014. A Study of Self-Confidence in Relation to Achievement Motivation of D.Ed Students. Global Journal for Research Analysis. 3(8), 56–58. Available from: https://www.worldwidejournals.com/global-journal-for-research-analysis-GJRA/recent_issues_pdf/2014/August/August_2014_1565180550_17.pdf
  29. [29] Healthcare Improvement Scotland, 2025. Ketso. Participation Toolkit. Available from: https://hisengage.scot/engaging-communities/participation-toolkit/ketso/ (cited 1 September 2025).
  30. [30] Buzan, T., Buzan, B., 1996. The Mind Map Book: How to Use Radiant Thinking to Maximize Your Brain's Untapped Potential. Plume: New York, NY, USA.
  31. [31] Rutherford, S., Limorenko, G., Amici-Dargan, S., 2017. “Shadow Module Leaders” – Student Experiences as Peer Teachers and Facilitators of Peer-Assisted Learning. In Proceedings of the Ireland International Conference on Education, Dublin, Ireland, 24–26 April 2017. Available from: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/101345
  32. [32] Huijser, H., Kimmins, L., 2006. Developing a Peer-Assisted Learning Community through MSN Messenger: A Pilot Program of PALS Online. University of Southern Queensland: Toowoomba, Australia. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228654049
  33. [33] Huijser, H., Kimmins, L., Evans, P., 2008. Peer Assisted Learning in Fleximode: Developing an Online Learning Community. Journal of Peer Learning. 1, 51–60. Available from: https://journalofpeerlearning.org/articles/7/files/668e20d35e579.pdf
  34. [34] Topping, K.J., 2005. Trends in Peer Learning. Educational Psychology. 25(6), 631–645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172

How to Cite

Natalie Quinn-Walker, Ana Mejia-Mejia. Student Partnership and Peer-Led Learning: Applying the Ketso Method in Public Health Education. Innovations in Pedagogy and Technology. 5 January 2026. https://doi.org/10.63385/ipt.v2i1.279
Citation formats

Copyright & License

Copyright © 2026 Natalie Quinn-Walker, Ana Mejia-Mejia. Published by Nature and Information Engineering Publishing Sdn. Bhd..

This journal publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Authors retain copyright. Accepted manuscripts are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Reuse is permitted under the terms of the license with proper attribution to the original source.

Article Metrics

604Abstract views
366Downloads