Toward a Harmonized Future: Regional Innovation Systems, Global Standards, and the Path to Sustainable Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63385/sriic.v1.i2.333Keywords:
Regional Innovation Systems, Global Standardization, Sustainable Development, Polycentric Governance, Knowledge Transfer, Technological Diffusion, Policy Coordination, Innovation PathwaysAbstract
Fragmentation between Regional Innovation Systems (RIS) and Global Standardization Frameworks (GSF) presents a critical barrier to advancing sustainable development, technological diffusion, and coherent international policy coordination. This paper investigates how harmonization between RIS and GSF can catalyze innovation while also addressing the risks of lock-in, inequity, and fragmentation. Drawing on a conceptual and narrative review, we develop a conceptual framework that positions standardization as both an enabler and constraint of innovation. Our analysis is guided by three dimensions: the tension between localized innovation and global uniformity, the role of standards as mediating mechanisms for diffusion and legitimacy, and the challenges of polycentric governance and path dependency. Through critical synthesis, the paper argues that standardization reduces uncertainty, scales markets, and facilitates knowledge transfer, but also risks privileging dominant actors and excluding local contexts. Polycentric governance emerges as the key solution, offering a pathway to reconcile regional diversity with the universality of global rules. The primary contribution is the proposal of a novel Comparative Framework and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) designed to systematically evaluate harmonization outcomes, addressing the critical gap in current innovation policy literature. We conclude that by reframing harmonization as a dynamic, iterative process rather than a fixed institutional goal, the paper highlights pathways for aligning innovation systems with global sustainability imperatives. The findings contribute to theory-building on innovation governance and provide insights for policy frameworks navigating technological and environmental transitions.
References
[1] Cooke, P., 2001. Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change. 10(4), 945–974.
[2] Asheim, B.T., Grillitsch, M., Trippl, M., 2016. Regional innovation systems: Past–present–future. In Handbook on the Geographies of Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK. pp. 45–62.
[3] Blind, K., 2016. The impact of standardisation and standards on innovation. In: Edler, J., Cunningham, P., Gök, A., et al. (Eds.). Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK. pp. 423–449.
[4] Bernini, G.N., 2023. Patent landscape on hydrogen technologies: Study of hydrogen technology specialisation across European regions [Master’s Thesis]. Politecnico di Torino: Turin, Italy.
[5] Swann, G.M.P., 2010. The Economics of Standardization: An Update. UK Department of Business, Innovation and Skills: London, UK. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a790abd40f0b679c0a0812d/10-1135-economics-of-standardization-update.pdf
[6] Lee, B.X., Kjaerulf, F., Turner, S., et al., 2016. Transforming our world: Implementing the 2030 agenda through sustainable development goal indicators. Journal of Public Health Policy. 37(Suppl 1), 13–31.
[7] Blind, K., Mangelsdorf, A., 2016. Motives to standardize: Empirical evidence from Germany. Technovation. 48, 13–24.
[8] Schot, J., Steinmueller, W.E., 2018. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy. 47(9), 1554–1567.
[9] Lundvall, B.Å., 2010. Scope, style, and theme of research on knowledge and learning societies. Journal of Knowledge Economy. 1(1), 18–23.
[10] Edquist, C., 2019. Towards a holistic innovation policy: Can the Swedish National Innovation Council (NIC) be a role model? Research Policy. 48(4), 869–879.
[11] Tether, B.S., Metcalfe, J.S., 2004. Services and systems of innovation. In Sectoral Systems of Innovation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 287–323.
[12] Theile, C.M., Beall, A.L., 2024. Narrative reviews of the literature: an overview. Journal of Dental Hygiene. 98(1), 78–82.
[13] Sukhera, J., 2022. Narrative reviews: flexible, rigorous, and practical. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 14(4), 414–417.
[14] Su, Y., Yan, Y., 2023. The influence of the two-tier network of a regional innovation system on knowledge emergence. Journal of Knowledge Management. 27(9), 2526–2547.
[15] Piqué, J.M., Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Etzkowitz, H., 2020. The role of universities in shaping the evolution of Silicon Valley’s ecosystem of innovation. Triple Helix. 7(2–3), 277–321.
[16] Binz, C., Truffer, B., 2017. Global innovation systems—a conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Research Policy. 46(7), 1284–1298.
[17] Viardot, E., McCarthy, I.P., Chen, J., 2021. Standardization in a digital and global world: state-of-the-art and future perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 68(1), 11–17.
[18] Knorringa, P., Nadvi, K., 2016. Rising power clusters and the challenges of local and global standards. Journal of Business Ethics. 133(1), 55–72.
[19] Henson, S., Humphrey, J., 2010. Understanding the complexities of private standards in global agri-food chains as they impact developing countries. Journal of Development Studies. 46(9), 1628–1646.
[20] Obuseh, E., Eyenubo, J., Alele, J., et al., 2025. A systematic review of barriers to renewable energy integration and adoption. Journal of Asian Energy Studies. 9, 26–45.
[21] Wiener, A., Börzel,T.A., Risse, T., 2019. European Integration Theory. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
[22] Jacob, D.E., Nelson, I.U., Izah, S.C., 2024. Indigenous water management strategies in the global south. In Water Crises and Sustainable Management in the Global South. Springer Nature: Singapore. pp. 487–525.
[23] Broome, A., Quirk, J., 2015. Governing the world at a distance: the practice of global benchmarking. Review of International Studies. 41(5), 819–841.
[24] Hojnik, J., Ruzzier, M., Ruzzier, M.K., et al., 2024. Review of EU projects with a focus on environmental quality: innovation, eco-innovation, and circular-economy elements. International Journal of Innovation Studies. 8(1), 1–12.
[25] Bernstein, S., van der Ven, H., 2017. Best practices in global governance. Review of International Studies. 43(3), 534–556.
[26] Ostrom, E., 2010. Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review. 100(3), 641–672.
[27] Pieraccini, M., 2019. Towards just resilience: representing and including new constituencies in adaptive governance and law. Journal of Environmental Law. 31(2), 213–234.
[28] Lysenko, S., Liubchenko, A., Kozakov, V.D., et al., 2024. Global cybersecurity: harmonising international standards and cooperation. Multidisciplinary Reviews. 7, e2024spe021.
[29] Parrilli, M.D., Balavac, M., Radicic, D., 2020. Business innovation modes and their impact on innovation outputs: regional variations and the nature of innovation across EU regions. Research Policy. 49(8), 104047.
[30] Tassey, G., 2019. Regional technology-based economic development: policies and impacts in the US and other economies. Annals of Science and Technology Policy. 3(1), 1–141.
[31] Foray, D., 2014. Smart Specialisation: Opportunities and Challenges for Regional Innovation Policy. Routledge: London, UK.
[32] Gereffi, G., 2005. The global economy: organization, governance, and development. In The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA. pp. 160–182.
[33] Armeanu, S.D., Vintila, G., Gherghina, S.C., 2017. A cross-country empirical study towards the impact of following ISO management system standards on Euro-area economic confidence. Amfiteatru Economic. 19(44), 144–158.
[34] Akpobome, O., 2024. The impact of emerging technologies on legal frameworks: a model for adaptive regulation. International Journal of Research Publication Reviews. 5(10), 5046–5060.
[35] Freire, D.V.C., 2023. Mission-critical communications from LMR to 5G: a technology assessment approach for smart city scenarios [PhD Thesis]. Universidade NOVA de Lisboa: Lisbon, Portugal.
[36] Altenburg, T., Pegels, A., 2017. Sustainability-oriented innovation systems—managing the green transformation. In: Sustainability-Oriented Innovation Systems in China and India. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 17–34.
[37] Vang, J., Chaminade, C., 2006. Building RIS in Developing Countries: Policy Lessons from Bangalore, India. CIRCLE, Lund University: Lund, Sweden.
[38] Romanchyshyna, I., 2023. Technical Barriers to Trade in “New Generation” RTAs and in the WTO Agreements: Conflict or Complementarity? Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland.
[39] Edler, J., Fagerberg, J., 2017. Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 33(1), 2–23.
[40] Ponte, S., 2019. Sustainability, global value chains and green capital accumulation. In Handbook on Global Value Chains. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK. pp. 228–247.
[41] North, D.C., 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
[42] Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A. (Eds.), 2015. The Handbook of Global Science, Technology, and Innovation. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA.
[43] Malecki, E.J., 2011. Connecting local entrepreneurial ecosystems to global innovation networks: open innovation, double networks and knowledge integration. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management. 14(1), 36–59.
[44] O’Connell, D., Walker, B., Abel, N., et al., 2015. The Resilience, Adaptation and Transformation Assessment Framework: From Theory to Application. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation: Canberra, Australia.
[45] Yaghmaei, E., 2018. Responsible research and innovation key performance indicators in industry: a case study in the ICT domain. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society. 16(2), 214–234.
[46] Le, D.N., Nguyen, V.H., 2024. Does quality certification or product diversification improve the performance of small and medium enterprises? Sustainability. 16(5), 2023.
[47] Del Río, P., Romero-Jordán, D., Peñasco, C., 2017. Analysing firm-specific and type-specific determinants of eco-innovation. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 23(2), 270–295.
[48] Creswell, J.W., Clark, V.L.P., 2017. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
[49] Wilcock, A.E., Boys, K.A., 2017. Improving quality management: ISO 9001 benefits for agrifood firms. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies. 7(1), 2–20.
[50] Kubitza, C., Krishna, V.V., 2020. Instrumental variables and the claim of causality: evidence from impact studies in maize systems. Global Food Security. 26, 100383.
[51] Ujwary-Gil, A., Florek-Paszkowska, A., 2025. Introduction to the Innovability Index: more than the fusion of innovation and sustainability. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation. 21(2), 5–14.
[52] Dutta, G., Kumar, R., Sindhwani, R., et al., 2021. Digitalization priorities of quality control processes for SMEs: a conceptual study in perspective of Industry 4.0 adoption. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 32(6), 1679–1698.
[53] Lagoke, O., Adesola, S., Soname, S., 2021. Social network analysis as a methodological tool to understand university–industry dynamism in enhancing the HEI curriculum: a case of the Nigerian oil industry. Studies in Higher Education. 46(11), 2417–2430.
[54] Yin, R.K., 2018. Case Study Research and Applications. 6th ed. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
[55] Kuhlmann, S., Rip, A., 2018. Next-generation innovation policy and grand challenges. Science and Public Policy. 45(4), 448–454.
[56] Meydan, C.H., Akkaş, H., 2024. The role of triangulation in qualitative research: converging perspectives. In Principles of Conducting Qualitative Research in Multicultural Settings. IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA. pp. 98–129.
[57] Tödtling, F., Trippl, M., Desch, V., 2022. New directions for RIS studies and policies in the face of grand societal challenges. European Planning Studies. 30(11), 2139–2156.
[58] Bandola-Gill, J., Grek, S., Tichenor, M., 2022. Harmonising global public policy: producing global standards, local data and statistical capacity development. In Governing the Sustainable Development Goals: Quantification in Global Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 41–67.
[59] Brekke, T., 2021. What do we know about the university contribution to regional economic development? A conceptual framework. International Regional Science Review. 44(2), 229–261.
[60] Ruttan, V.W., 2010. Sources of technical change: induced innovation, evolutionary theory, and path dependence. In Technological Change and the Environment. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 9–39.
[61] Wijen, F., 2014. Means versus ends in opaque institutional fields: trading off compliance and achievement in sustainability standard adoption. Academy of Management Review. 39(3), 302–323.
[62] Xinming, Z., 2023. Research on cultivating innovation and practical skills in higher vocational education. Frontiers in Education Research. 6(26), 29–36.
[63] Bach, D.C., 2016. Cross-border interactions and regionalism. In Region-Building in Africa: Political and Economic Challenges. Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY, USA. pp. 71–88.
[64] Pacheco, L., Lobo, C., Maldonado, I., 2022. Do ISO certifications enhance internationalization? The case of Portuguese industrial SMEs. Sustainability. 14(3), 1335.
[65] Babin, A., Ciloci, R., Davydenko, N., 2025. Perspectives of sustainable development of cluster organizations through internationalization and dual use. Smart Cities and Regional Development Journal. 9(3), 99–120.
[66] Wu, M., Gao, Y., Song, Q., et al., 2025. Integrated resource collaboration for RIS-assisted digital-twin-empowered Internet of Everything. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 12, 23275–23287.
[67] Claver-Cortés, E., Marco-Lajara, B., Sánchez-García, E., et al., 2020. A literature review on the effect of industrial clusters and the absorptive capacity on innovation. International Journal of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. 14(7), 494–503.
[68] Chari, S.G., 2025. Power, pixels, and politics: the geopolitics of emerging technologies in the digital age. London Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences. 25(2), 1–99.
[69] Erdogdu, E., 2025. The carbon border adjustment mechanism: opportunities and challenges for non-EU countries. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment. 14(1), e70000.
[70] Jedlickova, A., 2024. Ensuring ethical standards in the development of autonomous and intelligent systems. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence. 5(12), 5863–5870.
PDF