Gamifying Academic Integrity: An Inclusive, Interactive Model for Teaching Ethical Academic Practice in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63385/ipt.v2i2.371Keywords:
Academic Integrity, Gamification, Inclusive Education, Academic Literacies, EngagementAbstract
Academic integrity remains a key challenge in higher education. At Teesside University, increasing cases of plagiarism, collusion, and contract cheating highlighted the need for more engaging and educationally grounded interventions. In response, the English Language Centre (ELC) designed and delivered a two-part initiative integrating gamification and inclusive pedagogy to reframe integrity as a participatory academic literacy rather than a compliance exercise. The programme combined a large interactive lecture introducing core integrity principles with a practical workshop developing paraphrasing, quoting, and summarising skills. Kahoot! was embedded throughout as a gamified learning tool that fostered participation, inclusivity, and real-time feedback. Across 26 Embedded Academic Literacies (EAL) sessions, the initiative engaged 620 students from all five Schools. Anonymous feedback showed that over 90% of participants found the sessions useful and reported increased understanding, frequently describing them as “informative,” “interactive,” “engaging,” and “fun.” Participants also demonstrated a 25% reduction in average similarity scores compared with previous cohorts, indicating measurable improvement in integrity-related practices. Staff observed that engagement and responsiveness declined when institutional access to Kahoot! was temporarily lost, reinforcing its pedagogical value. This short communication presents a case study of this innovation, drawing on routine anonymous feedback and staff reflections to illustrate how gamification can enhance academic integrity education in inclusive, diverse settings. The findings suggest that framing integrity as an interactive literacy, supported by game-based participation, can increase engagement, confidence, and ethical academic practice across disciplines.
References
[1] Ahmad, H., Fauzi, M.A., 2024. Plagiarism in academic writing in higher education institutions: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences (IJonSES). 6(1), 64–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.623
[2] Bretag, T., 2020. A Research Agenda for Academic Integrity. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK.
[3] Tan, E., Carnegie, S., 2020. It’s not plagiarism, it’s a bad use of power phrasing: Assessment of home and international student (mis)understandings of citation practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 59(3), 285–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1844779
[4] Lea, M.R., Street, B.V., 2006. Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education. 23(2), 157–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
[5] Masripah, Anisah, A.S., Usman, A.T., 2025. Bridging Divides in Digital Pedagogy: A Narrative Review of Emerging Tools and Inclusive Practices. Eduscape: Journal of Education Insight. 3(1), 13–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61978/eduscape.v3i1.932
[6] Sailer, M., Hense, J.U., Mayr, S.U., et al., 2017. How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior. 69, 371–380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033
[7] Ar, A.Y., 2021. Gamification strategies in higher education: Leveraging past in the era of pandemic. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Education. 7(1), 41–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17501/24246700.2021.7105
[8] Pelizzari, F., 2024. Gamification in higher education. A systematic literature review. Italian Journal of Educational Technology. 31(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/1335
[9] Wingate, U., 2012. Using academic literacies and genre-based models for academic writing instruction: A “literacy” journey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 11(1), 26–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.006
[10] Kahu, E.R., 2013. Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 38(5), 758–773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
[11] Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., Paris, A.H., 2004. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research. 74(1), 59–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
[12] Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., et al., 2011. From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, Tampere, Finland, 28–30 September 2011; pp. 9–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
[13] Nicholson, S., 2015. A RECIPE for meaningful gamification. In: Reiners, T., Wood, L.C. (Eds.). Gamification in Education and Business. Springer: Berlin, Germany. pp. 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_1
[14] Nicol, D., 2010. From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 35(5), 501–517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559
[15] Kift, S., 2009. Articulating a Transition Pedagogy to Scaffold and to Enhance the First-Year Student Learning Experience in Australian Higher Education. Australian Learning and Teaching Council: Canberra, Australia. Available from: https://transitionpedagogy.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Kift-Sally-ALTC-Senior-Fellowship-Report-Sep-092.pdf
[16] Malecka, B., Boud, D., Carless, D., 2022. Eliciting, processing and enacting feedback: Mechanisms for embedding student feedback literacy within the curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education. 27(7), 908–922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1754784
PDF