The Role of ICT in the Educational Inclusion of Children in Conflict: A Study in the Northern Provinces of Mozambique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63385/ipt.v2i1.352Keywords:
Education, Educational Inclusion, Information and Communication Technologies, Conflict Situations, MozambiqueAbstract
This study examines the impact of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) on the educational inclusion of children displaced by conflict in the northern provinces of Mozambique, analyzing how these technologies contribute to their learning. The research explores disparities in access to and use of ICT in schools, emphasizing the challenges faced by displaced children. Employing a mixed-methods approach, data were collected from a sample of 35 participants through questionnaires administered to students, teachers, and school administrators; semi-structured interviews with educators and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs); focus groups with displaced children; and classroom observations. The analysis identifies three key findings: (i) ICT availability differs markedly between urban schools (70% with access) and rural/conflict-affected areas (30% with limited or no infrastructure); (ii) displaced children show strong interest in ICT but face low levels of digital literacy, hindering effective use; and (iii) teacher training substantially enhances the success of ICT-based methodologies, although ongoing support remains insufficient. The study underscores the urgent need for investment in infrastructure and continuous professional development to address regional inequalities and strengthen pedagogical practices. While ICT demonstrates clear potential, educational inclusion ultimately depends on overcoming disparities in access and adapting methodologies to the specific needs of displaced children.
References
[1] Allen, A., 2022. An introduction to constructivism: Its theoretical roots and impact on contemporary education. Journal of Learning Design and Leadership. 1(1), 1–11.
[2] Murphy, P., Ivinson, G., 2003. Pedagogy and cultural knowledge: A sociocultural perspective. Pedagogy, Culture and Society. 11(1), 5–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360300200157
[3] Lantolf, J.P., Poehner, M.E., 2014. Sociocultural Theory and the Pedagogical Imperative in L2 Education: Vygotskian Praxis and the Research/Practice Divide. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813850
[4] Mutekwe, E., 2018. Using a Vygotskian sociocultural approach to pedagogy: Insights from some teachers in South Africa. Journal of Education. 71, 59–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i71a04
[5] Robertson, D.J., 2022. Sociocultural pedagogy and the use of digital video in Higher Education [PhD Thesis]. The Open University: Milton Keynes, UK.
[6] Shah, R.K., 2019. Effective constructivist teaching and learning in the classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education. 7(4), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v7i4.600
[7] Choudhuri, D.D., 2014. Trauma-informed teaching in higher education. Available from: https://www.emich.edu/facdev/documents/connect-23/Choudhuri%20-%20Trauma%20Informed%20Teaching.pdf (15 October 2025).
[8] Clervil, R., Guarino, K., De Candia, C.J., et al., 2013. Trauma-Informed Care for Displaced Populations: A Guide for Community-Based Service Providers. The National Center on Family Homelessness, American Institutes for Research: Waltham, MA, USA.
[9] UNESCO IITE, 2024. Digital Technologies for Inclusive Education: Recommendations for Promoting an ICT-Based Learning Environment for Resource Centres and Schools. UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education: Moscow, Russia. Available from: https://iite.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/IITE_Publication-2_Recommendations.pdf
[10] UNESCO, 2023. Global Education Monitoring Report Summary 2023: Technology in Education: A Tool on Whose Terms? UNESCO: Paris, France. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501
[11] Ramnarain, U., Ncube, R., Teo, T., 2023. South African Life Sciences teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their influence on information communication and technology integration. Frontiers in Education. 8, 1217826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1217826
[12] Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Kallio, J., et al., 2023. Critical digital literacies at school level: A systematic review. Review of Education. 11(3), e3425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3425
[13] Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., Punie, Y., 2022. DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens—With New Examples of Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union: Luexmbourg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2760/115376
[14] Tinmaz, H., Lee, Y-T., Fanea-Ivanovici, M., et al., 2022. A systematic review on digital literacy. Smart Learning Environments. 9(1), 22.
[15] Frasseto, L.S., da Silva, I.N., Bilessimo, S.M.S., et al., 2022. Pedagogical models focused on the integration of ICT in basic education: A systematic review. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science. 9(8), 129–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.98.16
[16] Fernández-Otoya, F., Cabero-Almenara, J., Pérez-Postigo, G., et al., 2024. Digital and information literacy in basic-education teachers: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences. 14(2), 127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020127
[17] Sousa, R.P.D., 2016. Theories and Practices in Educational Technologies. EDUEPB: Campina Grande, Brazil. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7476/9788578793265 (in Portuguese)
[18] Glat, R., 2007. Inclusive Education: Culture and Daily School Life. 7 Letras: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Available from: https://buscaintegrada.ufrj.br/Record/aleph-UFR01-000822901/Details?utm_source (in Portuguese)
[19] Franco, R.M.D.S., Gomes, C., 2020. Inclusive education beyond special education: A partial review of national studies. Revista Psicopedagogia. 37(113). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-8486.20200018
[20] UNICEF, 2017. The State of the World’s Children 2017: Children in a Digital World. In State of the World's Children. United Nations Children's Fund's: Geneva, Switzerland.
[21] Pinho, T.d.S., Hornink, G.G., 2018. Use of Facebook as a support and interaction tool in the Biochemistry course. In: Hornink, G.G. (Ed.). Digital Technologies Mediating the Teaching-Learning of Sciences, 1st ed. Publisher of the Federal University of Alfenas—UNIFAL-MG: Alfenas, Brazil. pp. 45–78. (in Portuguese)
[22] Ricci, G.F.B., Barros, J.A.V.d.A., Hornink, G.G., 2018. Evaluation of digital media for the teaching of Biochemistry. In: Hornink, G.G. (Ed.). Digital Technologies Mediating the Teaching-Learning of Sciences, 1st ed. Publisher of the Federal University of Alfenas—UNIFAL-MG: Alfenas, Brazil. pp. 109–147. (in Portuguese)
[23] Hornink, G.G. (Ed.), 2018. Digital Technologies Mediating the Teaching-Learning of Sciences, 1st ed. Publisher of the Federal University of Alfenas—UNIFAL-MG: Alfenas, Brazil. Available from: https://www.unifal-mg.edu.br/bibliotecas/wp-content/uploads/sites/125/2020/05/05-TICs_2018_1.pdf (in Portuguese)
[24] Mantoan, M.T.E., 2015. Special education from an inclusive perspective: What teachers, managers, and parents say. Revista Diálogos e Perspectivas em Educação Especial. 2(1), 23–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36311/2358-8845.2015.v2n1.5169 (in Portuguese)
[25] Fonseca, F.F., Sena, R.K.R., Santos, R.L.A.D., et al., 2013. Childhood and adolescence vulnerabilities and Brazilian public intervention policies. Revista Paulista de Pediatria. 31(2), 258–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-05822013000200019 (in Portuguese)
[26] INEE, 2013. INEE Guidance Note on Conflict Sensitive Education. The Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies (INEE): New York, NY, USA. Available from: https://inee.org/sites/default/files/resources/INEE_CSE_Guidance_Note_EN.pdf
[27] UNESCO, 2018. ICT Competency Framework for Teachers, Version 3. UNESCO: Paris, France.
[28] Minea-Pic, A., 2020. OECD Education Working Papers No. 237: Innovating Teachers’ Professional Learning through Digital Technologies. OECD Publishing: Paris, France. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/3329fae9-en
[29] Wolfenden, F., Castillo-Canales, D., Roque-Gutierrez, E., et al., 2024. A Framework for Strengthening Teacher Professional Development Systems with ICT. Foundation for Information Technology Education and Development: Quezon City, Philippines.
[30] MacDonald, R.J., 2008. Professional development for ICT integration: Identifying and supporting a community of practice through design-based research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 40(4), 429–445.
[31] Alves Guimarães, U., Accadrolli Gobatto, A., Bacelar Silva, L., et al., 2023. Assistive technologies and other resources: Pathways to inclusion. RECIMA21—Revista Científica Multidisciplinar. 4(7), e473579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v4i7.3579 (in Portuguese)
[32] Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., Archer, W., 1999. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education. 2(2–3), 87–105.
[33] Moore, M.G., 1993. Theory of transactional distance. In: Keegan, D. (Ed.). Theoretical Principles of Distance Education, 1st ed. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 22–29.
[34] Berge, Z.L., 1995. Facilitating computer conferencing: Recommendations from the field. Educational Technology. 35(1), 22–30.
[35] Keegan, D., 1996. Foundations of Distance Education. Routledge: London, UK.
[36] Palloff, R.M., Pratt, K., 2007. Building Online Learning Communities: Effective Strategies for the Virtual Classroom. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA.
[37] Malta, D.P.d.L.N., Rodrigues, C.A.D., Tenório, I.B.d.S., et al., 2024. Integration of technology in collaborative learning: Strategies and impacts on modern education. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS). 29(6), 49–57. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385173876_Integracao_Da_Tecnologia_Na_Aprendizagem_Colaborativa_Estrategias_E_Impactos_No_Ensino_Moderno (in Portuguese).
[38] Gierus, B., 2025. Prevalence and quality of mixed methods research in educational subdisciplines: A systematic review. SAGE Open. 15(1), 2158244025133517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251335171
[39] Gonçalves, B., 2024. Challenges of Education in Mozambique in the Digital Era: From Memorisation Models to Developing Student Autonomy. Revista EDaPECI : Educação a Distância e Práticas Educativas Comunicacionais e Interculturais. 24(1). 106–119. Available from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/9476862.pdf (in Portuguese)
[40] Aleixo, F.V.F.A., 2025. Challenges of Higher Education in Mozambique in the Digital Era. Revista Educação Em Páginas. 4(4), e17145. Available from: https://periodicos2.uesb.br/redupa/article/download/17145/10394 (in Portuguese)
[41] Krueger, R.A., Casey, M.A., 2021. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 6th ed. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
[42] Flick, U., 2018. Triangulation in Qualitative Research: Conceptual and Methodological Strategies. Routledge: London, UK.
[43] Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L., 2022. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 4th ed. Sage Publication: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
PDF