Teacher Educators’ Challenges, Opportunities and Contemplations on Self-Determined Learning: Insights from a Qualitative-Constructivist Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63385/ipt.v2i1.351Keywords:
Heutagogy, Self-Determined Learning, Learning Community, Community of Practice, Teacher EducationAbstract
Following the COVID-19 pandemic, teacher education has pivoted toward self-determined learning, or heutagogy, a paradigm shift that demands increased learner autonomy and a radical redistribution of pedagogical responsibility. This qualitative-constructivist study explores how two learning communities of practice (CoPs), comprised of teacher educators, navigated the complexities of adopting this approach within their respective institutions. Through categorical content analysis of meeting recordings and semi-structured interviews, the research identifies a central tension between educators’ traditional roles as "gatekeepers" of academic knowledge and the heutagogical transition toward becoming mentors who facilitate student agency. Participants voiced significant concerns regarding the stability of canonical knowledge, the complexities of self-assessment, and the potential for grade inflation within rigid academic frameworks. However, the sources emphasize that these CoPs provided a vital "safe space" for collaborative reflection, effectively mitigating the professional loneliness often accompanying pedagogical innovation. The findings suggest that while heutagogy requires a profound epistemological revolution, its successful institutionalization depends on "bottom-up" initiatives fostered by lecturers and supported by "top-down" administrative openness. Ultimately, the sources advocate for the continued expansion of these communities to reshape perceptions of teaching and learning within both higher education and clinical school settings. By fostering a non-judgmental environment, these CoPs serve as essential catalysts for transforming teacher training into a more flexible, student-centered endeavor.
References
[1] Nieminen, J.H., Tuohilampi, L., 2020. ‘Finally studying for myself’ – examining student agency in summative and formative self-assessment models. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 45(7), 1031–1045.
[2] Maphalala, M.C., Mkhasibe, R.G., Mncube, D.W., 2021. Online Learning as a catalyst for self-directed learning in universities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Research in Social Sciences and Technology. 6(2), 233–248.
[3] Morris, M.L., Rohs, M., 2023. The potential for digital technology to support self-directed learning in formal education of children: A scoping review. Interactive Learning Environments. 31(4), 1974–1987.
[4] Stoten, D., 2023. Positioning through epistemic cognition in higher education: Conceptualising the ways in which academics in a business school view heutagogy. Higher Education. 87(4), 991–1007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01048-2
[5] Blaschke, L.M., 2021. The dynamic mix of heutagogy and technology: Preparing learners for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology. 52, 1629–1645.
[6] Hase, S., Kenyon, C., 2000. From andragogy to heutagogy. Ultibase Articles. 5(3), 1–10.
[7] Blaschke, L.M., 2014. Moving students forward in the PAH continuum. In: Blaschke, L.M., Kenyon, C., Hase, S. (Eds.). Experiences in Self-Determined Learning. Amazon: Seattle, WA, USA. pp. 56–67.
[8] Blaschke, L.M., Hase, S., 2019. Heutagogy and digital media networks. Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning. 1(1), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24135/pjtel.v1i1.1
[9] Lynch, M., Sage, T., Hitchcock, L.I., et al., 2021. A heutagogical approach for the assessment of Internet Communication Technology (ICT) assignments in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 18(1), 55.
[10] Glassner, A., 2022. Training youth at risk mentors in Paths, an innovative TE program: promoting resilience, mental wellbeing and meaningful learning through a self-determined learning environment. Learning Environments Research. 25, 841–857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09391-w
[11] Glassner, A., Back, S., 2020. Exploring Heutagogy in Higher Education: Academia Meets the Zeitgeist. Springer: London, UK.
[12] Blaschke, L.M., Marin, V., 2020. Applications of heutagogy in the educational use of e-portfolios. Revista de Educación a Distancia. 20(64), 6.
[13] Brenner, C.A., 2022. Self-regulated learning, self-determination theory and teacher candidates’ development of competency-based teaching practices. Smart Learning Environments. 9, 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00184-5
[14] Mwinkaar, L., Lonibe, J.F.Y., 2024. Heutagogy as an alternative in teacher education: Conceptions of lecturers and pre-service teachers of school of education and lifelong learning, SDD-UBIDS. Frontiers in Education. 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1389661
[15] Blaschke, L.M., 2016. Strategies for Implementing Self-Determined Learning (Heutagogy) within Education: A Comparison of Three Institutions (Australia, South Africa, and Israel) [Master’s Thesis]. Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg: Oldenburg, Germany.
[16] Wenger, E., 1998. Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. The Systems Thinker. 9(5), 2–3.
[17] Wenger, E., 2004. Knowledge management as a doughnut: Shaping your knowledge strategy through communities of practice. Ivey Business Journal. 68(3), 1–8.
[18] Wenger-Trayner, E., Wenger-Trayner, B., 2015. Introduction to communities of practice: A brief overview of the concept and its uses. Available from: https://www.wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice (cited 28 September 2025).
[19] Goodnough, K., 2020. Professional Learning and the Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education: Reflections of a Science Teacher Educator. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education. 20, 764–774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00119-1
[20] Shani, M., Shani, M., Tal, P., et al., 2019. Multifaceted identities of teacher educators as lifelong learners. In: Gammel, J.A., Motulsky, S., Rutstein-Riley, A. (Eds.). Identity and Lifelong Learning in Higher Education. Information Age Publishing: Charlotte, NC, USA. pp. 177–194.
[21] Wenger-Trayner, E., Wenger-Trayner, B., Cameron, J., 2023. Systems Convening: A Crucial Form of Leadership for the 21st Century. The Social Learning Lab: Sesimbra, Portugal.
[22] Booth, M., Blaschke, L.M., Hase, S., 2017. Practicing the practice: The heutagogy community of practice. In: McDonald, J., Cater-Steel, A. (Eds.). Implementing Communities of Practice in Higher Education: Dreamers and Schemers. Springer: Singapore. pp. 549–572.
[23] Shkedi, A., 2005. Words of Meaning: Qualitative Research – Theory and Practice. Ramot Publishing: Tel Aviv, Israel.
[24] Schwandt, T.A., 1994. Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. pp. 118–137.
[25] Gubrium, J.F., Holstein, J.A., 1994. Grounding the postmodern self. The Sociological Quarterly. 35(4), 685–703.
[26] Bingham, C., 2023. From data management to actionable findings: A five-phase process of qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183620
[27] Smith, S.U., Hayes, S., Shea, P., 2017. A critical review of the use of Wenger's community of practice (CoP) theoretical framework in online and blended learning research, 2000-2014. Online Learning. 21(1), 209–237.
[28] Akyildiz, S.T., 2019. Do 21st century teachers know about heutagogy or do they still adhere to traditional pedagogy and andragogy? International Journal of Progressive Education. 15(6), 151–169.
[29] Macfarlane, B., Bolden, R., Watermeyer, R., 2024. Three perspectives on leadership in higher education: Traditionalist, reformist, pragmatist. Higher Education. 88, 1381–1402.
[30] Panda, B.N., Behera, L., Basantia, T.K., 2022. World scenario of regulatory bodies of teacher education programs. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
PDF