Abstract

The topic of Subject Education Specialists (SESs) to assist subject teachers in the Alfred Nzo West District (Maluti Circuit Management Center and Matatiele Circuit Management Center) is a cause for concern. This study aimed to investigate and elucidate the disparity between policy directives for teacher support and their actual implementation in schools, where SESs struggle to fulfill their obligations. Poor learner performance displayed on the South African School Administration and Management System (SA-SAMS) on an annual basis prompted this investigation. This study adopted a qualitative research approach underpinned by the interpretive paradigm to explore the complex dynamics between Subject Advisor interventions and learner academic performance. The study employed qualitative techniques, case study design, interviews and observations, which are necessary for a thorough understanding and for methodological triangulation. A purposive sampling framework was used in selecting 30 teachers from two Circuit Management Centres (15 from Maluti and 15 from Matatiele). Participants included Foundation Phase/EFAL teachers, Sesotho and isiXhosa home language teachers, and Mathematics teachers in the Intermediate. Sampling was designed to be inclusive, regardless of gender, race, or socioeconomic status. Data were gathered using semi-structured and unstructured interviews, case study, and observations, and the credibility and trustworthiness of the data analysis were confirmed by a pilot study. The findings demonstrated that SESs frequently lacked the subject-matter and pedagogical competence needed to support subject instructors, leading to poor learner outcomes. The proposals include ensuring merit-based selections, bolstering SES professional development, and providing adequate funding for effective curricular support.

Keywords

Subject Education SpecialistsSocioeconomic StatusAttitudeContent KnowledgeGeneral Education and Training

References

  1. [1] Department of Basic Education, 2020. A 25 Year Review of Progress in the Basic Education Sector. Department of Basic Education: Pretoria, South Africa.
  2. [2] Hooper, M., Shipan, R., Flanagan, K., et al., 2023. PIRLS 2021 U.S. Highlights Web Report (NCES 2023054). National Center for Education Statistics: Washington, DC, USA.
  3. [3] Bantwini, B., Diko, N., 2011. Factors Affecting South African District Officials’ Capacity to Provide Effective Teacher Support. Creative Education. 2(3), 226–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2011.23031
  4. [4] MK Party, 2024. The State of Education in South Africa: Challenges and Prospects. Available from: https://mkparty.org.za/the-state-of-education-in-south-africa/ (cited 9 July 2024).
  5. [5] Oyuntsetseg, D., Ariunzul, E., 2025. Teachers Require Ongoing Professional Growth. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science. 1(45). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.1(45).2025.3202
  6. [6] Barret, C., Breyer, R., 2014. The Influence of Effective Leadership on Teaching and Learning. Journal of Research Initiatives. 1(2), 3.
  7. [7] Kemethofer, D., Helm, C., Warwas, J., 2025. Does Educational Leadership Enhance Instructional Quality and Student Achievement? The Case of Austrian Primary School Leaders. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 28(3), 461–485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.2021294
  8. [8] Shingange, T.A., 2021. Quality Assurance in Teaching and Learning in the Foundation Phase in the Limpopo Province [Master’s Thesis]. University of South Africa: Pretoria, South Africa.
  9. [9] National Education Evaluation and Development Unit, 2013. National Report 2012: The State of Literacy Teaching and Learning in the Foundation Phase. National Education Evaluation and Development Unit: Pretoria, South Africa.
  10. [10] Mthembu, P.E., Bhengu, T.T., 2025. District Leadership Strategies and Its Challenges in Supporting Teaching and Learning: Perspectives of Two Districts in South Africa. Frontiers in Education. 10, 1629153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1629153
  11. [11] Khosa, G., 2014. Systematic School Improvement Interventions in South Africa: Some Practical Lessons from Development Practitioners. African Minds: Cape Town, South Africa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47622/9781920677374
  12. [12] Malinga, C.B., Jita, L.C., Bada, A.A., 2021. Middle Management and Instructional Leadership: The Case of Natural Sciences’ Heads of Departments in South Africa. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning. 6(2), 119–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v6i2.2425
  13. [13] Mdabe, X.H., 2021. The Role of Subject Advisors in Supporting Teaching and Learning: Experiences of Primary Schools’ Departmental Heads [Master’s Thesis]. University of KwaZulu-Natal: Durban, South Africa. Available from: https://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/items/ca8faf81-c3e9-4e16-ae5e-c92ac4e7c3e2
  14. [14] Department of Basic Education, 2012. Goal 16. In Action Plan to 2014: Towards the Realisation of Schooling 2025. Department of Basic Education: Pretoria, South Africa.
  15. [15] Govender, S., 2018. South African Teachers’ Perspectives on Support Received in Implementing Curriculum Changes. South African Journal of Education. 38(Supplement 2), S1–S12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38ns2a1484
  16. [16] Johnson, F., Erasmus, C., 2025. The provision of learning support in mainstream schools: A South African perspective on learning support advisors’ roles, experiences, and challenges. The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning. 20(1), 115–137. Available from: https://scielo.org.za/pdf/ijtl/v20n1/07.pdf
  17. [17] Reyes, M.B., Oropa, J.C., 2025. Instructional Supervision of Master Teachers: Its Critical Role in Advancing Teachers’ and Learners’ Performance. American Journal of Education and Technology. 4(2), 17–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v4i2.4399
  18. [18] Chuene, D.M., Teane, F.M., 2024. Resource Inadequacy as a Barrier to Effective Curriculum Implementation by Life Sciences Teachers in South Africa. South African Journal of Education. 44(2), 1–10.
  19. [19] Gumbo, M.T., 2020. Professional Development of Technology Teachers: Does Their Training Meet Their Needs? Perspectives in Education. 38(1), 58–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v38i1.5
  20. [20] Mabunda, P., 2023. The Implementation of the Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement: School Managers’ Perspectives and Experiences. Perspectives in Education. 41(4), 65–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38140/pie.v41i4.6702
  21. [21] Ngubane, M., 2014. Education in South Africa 20 Years On: Quality and Safety in Schools Remain Priorities. Available from: https://www.polity.org.za/article/education-in-sa-20-years-on-quality-and-safety-in-schools-remain-priorities-2014-06-25 (cited 9 July 2024).
  22. [22] Soobrayan, B., 2012. Minister Meets District Directors. Department of Basic Education: Pretoria, South Africa.
  23. [23] Diko, N., Haupt, G., Molefe, M.R.M., 2011. Reviewing the Role of the Provincial and District Offices in the Implementation of Assessment Policies in Gauteng and Western Cape Provinces. Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC): Pretoria, South Africa. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/3913
  24. [24] Zheng, H., 2020. Stakeholder Perceptions on the Role of School Inspection Standards in Demonstrating Education Quality in China. Quality Assurance in Education. 28(2), 105–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-09-2019-0093
  25. [25] Nketsiah, J., Motlhabane, A.T., 2024. Exploring the Teaching and Learning of Qualitative Analysis in Ghanaian Senior High Schools: Teaching and Learning of Qualitative Analysis. International Education Trend Issues. 2(2), 397–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56442/ieti.v2i2.898
  26. [26] De Clercq, F., Shalem, Y., 2014. Teacher Knowledge and Employer-Driven Professional Development: A Critical Analysis of the Gauteng Department of Education Programmes. Southern African Review of Education. 20(1), 129–147.
  27. [27] Abbott, I., Middlewood, D., Robinson, S., 2014. Prospecting for Support in a Wild Environment: Investigating a School-to-School Support System for Primary School Leaders. School Leadership and Management. 34(5), 439–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2013.849685
  28. [28] Dominguez, P.S., Nicholls, C., Storandt, B., 2006. A Comparative Assessment of South Carolina’s External Review Team Program. Hezel Associates LLC: Syracuse, NY, USA. Available from: https://dc.statelibrary.sc.gov/server/api/core/bitstreams/d5027673-fc4c-4c39-a109-d3cd6246053a/content
  29. [29] Takyi, B., Yalley, C.E., Owusu, F., et al., 2025. Challenges towards the Implementation of the Standards-Based Curriculum in Ghana: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Instruction. 18(3), 577–594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.18330a
  30. [30] Ahtiainen, R., Pulkkinen, J., Jahnukainen, M., 2021. The 21st-Century Reforms (Re)Shaping the Education Policy of Inclusive and Special Education in Finland. Education Sciences. 11(11), 750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110750
  31. [31] Theron, J., 2021. Foundation Phase Teachers’ Experiences of Teaching Mathematics and Home Language Using the Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement at One Gauteng Special School [Master’s Thesis]. University of South Africa: Pretoria, South Africa.
  32. [32] Set, L., 2024. Inclusive Practices for Supporting Learners with Special Educational Needs in Early Childhood Development in Rural Namibia. Journal of Educational Studies. 24(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.59915/jes.2025.24.4.5
  33. [33] Dhanpat, K., 2022. The Education District’s Role in Developing Principals’ Instructional Leadership in Schools [PhD Thesis]. University of Johannesburg: Johannesburg, South Africa.
  34. [34] Zulu, P.D., 2019. Experiences of District-Based Support Team with Regards to Screening, Identification, Assessment, and Support Implementation in Zululand District, KwaZulu-Natal [Master's thesis]. University of Zululand: KwaDlangezwa, South Africa.
  35. [35] Hompashe, D.M., 2024. Does Instructional Leadership Drive Educational Improvement in South Africa? Evidence from the Oaxaca-Blinder Decomposition Analysis. Development Southern Africa. 41(2), 404–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2024.2309455
  36. [36] Li, J., Copur-Gencturk, Y., 2024. Learning through Teaching: The Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge among Novice Mathematics Teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching. 50(4), 582–597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2024.2358041
  37. [37] Junias, R., 2009. Factors affecting the teaching of English reading skills in the second language of grade 3 learners [Master’s Thesis]. University of South Africa: Pretoria, South Africa.
  38. [38] Afifah, S., Mudzakir, A., Nandiyanto, A.B.D., 2022. How to Calculate a Paired Sample t-Test Using SPSS Software: From Step-by-Step Processing for Users to Practical Examples in Student Learning Outcomes Analysis. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science. 2(1), 81–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijotis.v2i1.45895
  39. [39] Jones, D.T., 2021. Exploring Picture Books and Primary School Children’s Spirituality [PhD Thesis]. The Open University: Milton Keynes, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21954/ou.ro.0001275a

How to Cite

Jeremia Lepheana. Critique of the Subject Advisor’s Contribution to the Poor Academic Performance of Learners in Selected Schools of Alfred Nzo West District. Innovations in Pedagogy and Technology. 16 July 2026. https://doi.org/10.63385/ipt.v2i3.101075
Citation formats

Copyright & License

Copyright © 2026 Jeremia Lepheana. Published by Nature and Information Engineering Publishing Sdn. Bhd..

This journal publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Authors retain copyright. Accepted manuscripts are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Reuse is permitted under the terms of the license with proper attribution to the original source.

Article Metrics

480Abstract views
421Downloads