Quiet Quitting among Tunisian Civil Servants: A Quantitative Analysis of Organizational Antecedents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63385/hrsp.v1i1.442Keywords:
Quit Quitting, Organizational Recognition, Workload, JD-R Model, Tunisian Public SectorAbstract
Quiet quitting—employees' strategic reduction of discretionary effort while maintaining contractual obligations—has emerged as a critical concern in organizational psychology. Yet empirical research remains largely Western-centric and private-sector focused. This study addresses these gaps through the first quantitative analysis of quiet quitting antecedents among Tunisian public servants, integrating Job Demands–Resources (JD-R), social exchange, and Conservation of Resources (COR) frameworks. Drawing on a context-sensitive perspective, the study conceptualizes quiet quitting as a rational adaptive response to sustained organizational imbalance rather than as an individual or generational deviation. Based on data collected from 124 Tunisian civil servants across multiple public sectors, hierarchical regression analysis (R2 = 0.52, ΔR2 = 0.44, p < 0.001) reveals organizational recognition (β = −0.34, p < 0.001) and workload (β = 0.23, p = 0.015) as dominant predictors, confirming their roles as core motivational resources and stress-inducing demands within the JD-R framework. Managerial support and organizational justice show expected directional trends (p ≈ 0.09) but limited direct effects, suggesting that their influence may be constrained by bureaucratic rigidity and centralized decision-making structures characteristic of public administration. Findings position quiet quitting as a form of psychological adjustment shaped by high job security and limited exit opportunities, rather than as individual deviance. Theoretically, results advocate greater contextualization of disengagement models by integrating institutional constraints and employment regimes. In practice, interventions should prioritize recognition systems and workload management to restore reciprocity, conserve employee resources, and sustain functional engagement within public-sector organizations.
References
[1] Kahn, W.A., 1990. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal. 33(4), 692–724.
[2] Harris, L.C., 2025. Commitment and quiet quitting: A qualitative longitudinal study. Human Resource Management. 64(2), 565–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22274
[3] Galanis, P., Katsiroumpa, A., Vraka, I., et al., 2023. The quiet quitting scale: Development and initial validation. AIMS Public Health. 10(4), 828–848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2023055
[4] Johnson, J.R., 2023. What’s new about quiet quitting (and what’s not). The Transdisciplinary Journal of Management. 1–14. Available from: https://tjm.scholasticahq.com/article/72079-what-s-new-about-quiet-quitting-and-what-s-not
[5] Afi, N.J., 2025. The Silent Disengagement: Exploring the Impact of Quiet Quitting on Organizational Culture. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. 9(6), 1508–1530. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.906000121
[6] Colombo, S., 2018. Political and Institutional Transition in North Africa: Egypt and Tunisia in Comparative Perspective. Routledge: London, UK.
[7] Gallup, 2025. State of the Global Workplace 2025 Report: Understanding Employees, Informing Leaders. Gallup: Washington, DC, USA.
[8] Miller‐Mor‐Attias, R., Vigoda‐Gadot, E., 2022. Evolving motivation in public service: A three‐phase longitudinal examination of public service motivation, work values, and academic studies among Israeli students. Public Administration Review. 82(2), 210–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13452
[9] Hamouche, S., Koritos, C., Papastathopoulos, A., 2023. Quiet quitting: Relationship with other concepts and implications for tourism and hospitality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 35(12), 4297–4312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2022-1362
[10] Zhong, X., Al Mamun, A., Masukujjaman, M., et al., 2023. Modelling the significance of organizational conditions on quiet quitting intention among Gen Z workforce in an emerging economy. Scientific Reports. 13(1), 15438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42591-3
[11] Ochis, K., 2024. Generation Z and “Quiet Quitting”: Rethinking onboarding in an era of employee disengagement. Millennium Business Review. 17(1), 83–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35692/07183992.17.1.7
[12] Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., 2000. The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry. 11(4), 227–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
[13] Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E., 2007. The Job Demands–Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 22(3), 309–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
[14] Maslach, C., Leiter, M.P., 2016. Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry. 15(2), 103–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20311
[15] Afrahi, B., Blenkinsopp, J., de Arroyabe, J.C.F., et al., 2022. Work disengagement: A review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review. 32(2), 100822.
[16] Homans, G.C., 1958. Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology. 63(6), 597–606.
[17] Blau, P.M., 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. Wiley: New York, NY, USA.
[18] Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E.L., Daniels, S.R., et al., 2017. Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals. 11(1), 479–516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099
[19] Eisenberger, R., Rockstuhl, T., Shoss, M.K., et al., 2019. Is the employee–organization relationship dying or thriving? A temporal meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. 104(8), 1036–1057.
[20] Cropanzano, R., Mitchell, M.S., 2005. Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management. 31(6), 874–900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
[21] Hobfoll, S.E., 1989. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist. 44(3), 513–524.
[22] Halbesleben, J.R., Neveu, J.P., Paustian-Underdahl, S.C., et al., 2014. Getting to the “COR” understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of Management. 40(5), 1334–1364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527130
[23] Hobfoll, S.E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.P., et al., 2018. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 5(1), 103–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
[24] Brun, J.P., Dugas, N., 2005. Recognition at work: Analysis of a meaningful concept. Gestion, 30(2), 79–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/riges.302.0079 (in French)
[25] Saks, A.M., 2006. Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 21(7), 600–619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
[26] Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., 2002. Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology. 87(4), 698–714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.698
[27] Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., Weibel, A., et al., 2017. Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes? Journal of Economic Psychology. 61, 244–258.
[28] Perry, J.L., 2010. A strategic agenda for public human resource management research. Review of Public Personnel Administration. 30(1), 20–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X09351821
[29] World Bank, 2019. Tunisia Public Expenditure Review: A New Pact for the Transition. World Bank: Washington, DC, USA.
[30] Colquitt, J.A., 2001. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology. 86(3), 386–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
[31] Greenberg, J., 1987. A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review. 12(1), 9–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4306437
[32] Colquitt, J.A., Hill, E.T., De Cremer, D., 2023. Forever focused on fairness: 75 years of organizational justice in Personnel Psychology. Personnel Psychology. 76(2), 413–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12556
[33] Cole, M.S., Bernerth, J.B., Walter, F., et al., 2010. Organizational justice and individuals' withdrawal: Unlocking the influence of emotional exhaustion. Journal of Management Studies. 47(3), 367–390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00864.x
[34] Patel, P.C., Guedes, M.J., Bachrach, D.G., et al., 2025. A multidimensional quiet quitting scale: Development and test of a measure of quiet quitting. PLoS One. 20(4), e0317624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317624
[35] Bass, B.M., Bass Bernard, M., 1985. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press: New York, NY, USA.
[36] Banks, G.C., McCauley, K.D., Gardner, W.L., et al., 2016. A meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: A test for redundancy. The Leadership Quarterly. 27(4), 634–652.
[37] Walumbwa, F.O., Avolio, B.J., Gardner, W.L., et al., 2008. Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management. 34(1), 89–126.
[38] Scandura, T.A., Graen, G.B., 1984. Moderating effects of initial leader–member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology. 69(3), 428–436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.428
[39] Harms, P.D., Credé, M., Tynan, M., et al., 2017. Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review. The Leadership Quarterly. 28(1), 178–194.
[40] Karasek, R.A., 1998. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 3(4), 322–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8998.3.4.322
[41] Schaufeli, W.B., Taris, T.W., 2013. A critical review of the job demands-resources model: Implications for improving work and health. In Bridging Occupational, Organizational and Public Health: A Transdisciplinary Approach. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands. pp. 43–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5640-3_4
[42] Drela, K., 2024. The quiet quitting phenomenon from a human capital management perspective. In Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology: Organization and Management Series NO. 199. Silesian University of Technology Publishing House: Gliwice, Poland. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2024.199.9
[43] Motyka, B., 2018. Employee engagement and performance: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Management and Economics. 54(3), 227–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2018-0018
[44] Frangi, L., Signoretti, A., Zhang, T., 2024. Union officers' turnaway: Push, pull, and values in Canada, Italy, and the United States. British Journal of Industrial Relations. 62(4), 824–848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12822
[45] Chiaburu, D.S., Harrison, D.A., 2008. Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 93(5), 1082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1082
[46] Kristof‐Brown, A.L., Zimmerman, R.D., Johnson, E.C., 2005. Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta‐analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology. 58(2), 281–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
PDF