Autoethnography as a Research Method in Cross-Cultural Education Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63385/cces.v1i2.380Keywords:
Autoethnography, Cross-Cultural Education, Reflexivity, Qualitative Research MethodsAbstract
This review article examines the application of autoethnography as a research method and pedagogical tool within cross-cultural education studies. It argues that autoethnography’s unique epistemological grounding in personal experience, systematic reflexivity, and relational ethics provides a powerful means to investigate the complex and often unspoken affective dimensions of teaching and learning in cross-cultural education. The review synthesizes a diverse body of literature to demonstrate how autoethnography effectively bridges theoretical frameworks with lived educational practice. It traces the method’s intellectual genealogy and evolution, outlining its major typologies, including analytic, evocative, critical, and collaborative autoethnography, and their relevance for educational research. The analysis highlights autoethnography’s distinctive capacity to foster critical cultural awareness, challenge embedded power imbalances, and cultivate genuine empathy among educators and students, with specific illustrations from teacher education, foreign-language learning, and the communication of Chinese educational wisdom. However, the article also critically engages with significant challenges, including ongoing debates about methodological rigor, ethical complexities in representing self and others, and practical implementation barriers in diverse educational settings. The conclusion affirms that when practiced with analytical discipline and ethical responsibility, autoethnography offers a unique pathway for generating situated and transformative knowledge in cross-cultural education. By creating meaningful connections between personal narrative and broader cultural-structural analysis, it ultimately contributes to more nuanced understandings of cross-cultural educational encounters and their implications for educational theory and practice.
References
[1]Anderson, L., 2006. Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 35(4), 373–395.
[2]Bochner, A.P., 2017. Heart of the matter: A mini-manifesto for autoethnography. International Review of Qualitative Research. 10(1), 67–80.
[3]Zhang, H.L., 2022. Cross-Cultural Communication in the Post-COVID-19 Era: What Should History Education Do for It? Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method. 42(3), 38–44. (in Chinese)
[4]Zhang, W., 2022. The cross-cultural perspective of comparative education: Criticism and transcendence. International and Comparative Education. 44(1), 50–58. (in Chinese)
[5]Chang, H., 2007. Autoethnography: Raising cultural consciousness of self and others. In Methodological Developments in Ethnography. Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Leeds, UK. pp. 207–221.
[6]Tarisayi, K.S., 2023. Autoethnography as a qualitative methodology: Conceptual foundations, techniques, benefits and limitations. Encyclopaideia. 27(67), 53–63.
[7]Chen, Y.T., Pan, Y., 2023. Cross-cultural competency cultivation in English teaching. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics. 45(S02), 261–263. (in Chinese)
[8]Wall, S., 2006. An autoethnography on learning about autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 5(2), 146–160.
[9]Adams, T.E., Ellis, C., Jones, S.H., 2017. Autoethnography. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA. pp. 1–11.
[10]Méndez, M., 2013. Autoethnography as a research method: Advantages, limitations and criticisms. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal. 15(2), 279–287.
[11]Bochner, A., Ellis, C., 2016. Evocative Autoethnography: Writing Lives and Telling Stories. Routledge: New York, NY, USA.
[12]Ngunjiri, F.W., Hernandez, K.A.C., Chang, H., 2010. Living autoethnography: Connecting life and research. Journal of Research Practice. 6(1), E1.
[13]Stahlke Wall, S., 2016. Toward a moderate autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 15(1), 1609406916674966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406916674966
[14]Winkler, I., 2018. Doing autoethnography: Facing challenges, taking choices, accepting responsibilities. Qualitative Inquiry. 24(4), 236–247.
[15]Le Roux, C.S., 2017. Exploring rigour in autoethnographic research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 20(2), 195–207.
[16]Sparkes, A.C., 2018. Autoethnography comes of age: Consequences, comforts, and concerns. In The Wiley Handbook of Ethnography of Education. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA. pp. 479–499.
[17]Cooper, R., Lilyea, B., 2022. I’m interested in autoethnography, but how do I do it. The Qualitative Report. 27(1), 197–208.
[18]Hughes, S., Pennington, J.L., Makris, S., 2012. Translating autoethnography across the AERA standards: Toward understanding autoethnographic scholarship as empirical research. Educational Researcher. 41(6), 209–219.
[19]Walford, G., 2021. What is worthwhile auto-ethnography? Research in the age of the selfie. Ethnography and Education. 16(1), 31–43.
[20]Medford, K., 2006. Caught with a fake ID: Ethical questions about slippage in autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry. 12(5), 853–864.
[21]Lapadat, J.C., 2017. Ethics in autoethnography and collaborative autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry. 23(8), 589–603.
[22]Adams, T.E., 2017. Autoethnographic responsibilities. International Review of Qualitative Research. 10(1), 62–66.
[23]Poerwandari, E.K., 2021. Minimizing bias and maximizing the potential strengths of autoethnography as a narrative research. Japanese Psychological Research. 63(4), 310–323.
[24]Tian, X., Wu, H., Tian, R., 2025. Dual and multiple identities: stigmatisation and the dilemmas of being a translator of rainbow works in China. Sex Education. 25(5), 743–757.
[25]Tian, X., Rao, Y., Chen, Z., 2025. Love is (not) love? Exploring Chinese university teachers’ agency in translating rainbow works. Gender and Education. 37(2), 192–209.
[26]Tian, X., Yuan, B., 2025. Beyond translation: exploring the stigmatization of rainbow works translation under frame theory. Journal of Homosexuality. 72(6), 1151–1173.
[27]Hamdan, A., 2012. Autoethnography as a genre of qualitative research: A journey inside out. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 11(5), 585–606.
[28]Hernandez-Carranza, G., Carranza, M., Grigg, E., 2021. Using auto-ethnography to bring visibility to coloniality. Qualitative Social Work. 20(6), 1517–1535.
[29]Guyotte, K.W., Sochacka, N.W., 2016. Is this research? Productive tensions in living the (collaborative) autoethnographic process. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 15(1), 1609406916631758.
[30]Witkin, S., 2022. Autoethnography and social work: Strange bedfellows or complementary partners? Social Work and Social Sciences Review. 23(2), 19–35.
[31]Hughes, S., Noblit, G., 2020. Meta-ethnography of autoethnographies: A worked example of the method using educational studies. In: Kakos, M., Fritzsche, B. (Eds.). Meta-Ethnographic Synthesis in Education. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 83–99.
[32]Zhou, Z.J., 2023. The “5W” curriculum model for cultivating cross-cultural competence in English teacher education in the new era. Huaxia Culture Forum. (4), 227–235. (in Chinese)
[33]Chi, R., Zhang, H., Kulich, S., 2022. A collaborative autoethnography of developing a ‘Cultural Stories’ exercise for intercultural teaching in China. Language and Intercultural Communication. 22(5), 519–533.
[34]Liu, Q., 2025. Implementing cross-cultural education in English for forestry majors: A case study of the 26th IUFRO Congress. China Forest Products Industry. 62(3), 96. (in Chinese)
[35]Wibowo, A.H., Mohamad, B., Djatmika, et al., 2024. Designing and assessing experiential learning pedagogy for an intercultural communicative competence training module: a quasi-experimental study. Frontiers in Education. 9, 1470209.
[36]Jiang, X., 2021. Internationalization of higher education under the belt and road initiatives: a systematic literature review. Beijing International Review of Education. 3(1), 38–55.
[37]Miao, Z.Y., 2025. Research on the internationalization path of traditional Chinese medicine higher education. China Higher Education. (6), 51–56. (in Chinese)
[38]Hua, Z., Zhang, L., 2025. Research on TCM Culture Communication and Education from a Cross-Cultural Perspective—Take the “Materia Medica China” as an Example. Frontiers in Educational Research. 8(5), 184–190.
[39]Salzmann-Erikson, M., 2024. A scoping review of autoethnography in nursing. International Journal of Nursing Sciences. 11(5), 586–594.
[40]Ibrahim, K., Weller, S., Elvidge, E., et al., 2023. Using collaborative autoethnography to explore the teaching of qualitative research methods in medicine. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 28(5), 1467–1483.
[41]Li, J.J., 2023. A study on the (cross-)cultural presentation in college general English textbooks. Foreign Language World. (1), 66–75. (in Chinese)
Downloads
PDF
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Xiaoming Tian, Zeyu Zhang, Lihua Xu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.