Journal of Emerging Markets and Management

Publisher Name Change Notice: Starting in 2026, all journals and manuscripts will be published under the new publisher name Nature and Information Engineering Publishing Sdn. Bhd.

Harnessing Technological Innovation for Poverty Reduction: Sectoral and Microsimulation Insights from Cameroon and the DRC

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63385/jemm.v2i1.307

Keywords:

Technological Innovation and Poverty, Technological Innovation and Sectoral Productivity, Technological Innovation and Microsimulation, Computable General Equilibrium Model, Central Africa

Abstract

This study investigates Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of Congo, both contending with significant technological disparities—defined as variations in capital-augmenting technological capacity across sectors that influence productivity and growth potential. Using data from the year 2015, the analysis employs a dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model combined with a microsimulation approach. The study examines how capital-augmenting technological innovation (TI)-that is, improvements in the efficiency of capital use-affects key macroeconomic variables such as GDP growth, wage rates, consumption patterns, and household welfare. Results from the CGE simulations reveal that increased TI positively influences GDP growth through contributions from agriculture, industry, and transport sectors. Welfare and income effects benefit households engaged in innovative sectors, while investment and consumption responses differ across activities. At the micro level, higher TI reduces poverty rates in both countries, especially within agriculture, industry, and transport. The findings highlight the importance of targeted investments in technology-intensive sectors to maximise TI’s benefits for growth, income distribution, and poverty reduction. Policymakers are encouraged to foster innovation-friendly environments, support entrepreneurship, and promote inclusive growth strategies that enhance labour market outcomes and long-term welfare.

References

[1] Hartmann, V., Wacker, K.M., 2023. Poverty decompositions with counterfactual income and inequality dynamics. Review of Development Economics. 27(3), 1746–1768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12998

[2] Wilson, E.J., Jayanthakumaran, K., Verma, R., 2022. Urban poverty, growth, and inequality: A needed paradigm shift? Review of Development Economics. 26(2), 941–961.

[3] African Union Commission, 2015. Sciences, Technology and Innovation Strategy for Africa 2024 (STISA-2024). African Union Commission: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Available from: https://au.int/sites/default/files/newsevents/workingdocuments/33178-wd-stisa-english_-_final.pdf

[4] Romer, P.M., 1986. Increasing returns and long–run growth. Journal of Political Economy. 94(5), 1002–1037.

[5] Solow, R.M., 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 70(1), 65–94.

[6] George, G., McGahan, A.M., Prabhu, J., 2012. Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies. 49(4), 661–683.

[7] Chen, X., Rahaman, M.A., Murshed, M., et al., 2023. Causality analysis of the impacts of petroleum use, economic growth, and technological innovation on carbon emissions in Bangladesh. Energy. 267, 126565.

[8] Anakpo, G., Oyenubi, A., 2022. Technological innovation and economic growth in Southern Africa: Application of panel dynamic OLS regression. Development Southern Africa. 39(4), 543–557.

[9] Yeon, J.I., Lee, J.D., Baek, C., 2021. A tale of two technological capabilities: Economic growth revisited from a technological capability transition perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 46, 574–605.

[10] Zhou, G., Luo, S., 2018. Higher education input, technological innovation, and economic growth in China. Sustainability. 10(8), 2615.

[11] Murad, M.W., Alam, M.M., Noman, A.H.M., et al., 2019. Dynamics of technological innovation, energy consumption, energy price and economic growth in Denmark. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy. 38(1), 22–29.

[12] Amankwah-Amoah, J., 2019. Technological revolution, sustainability, and development in Africa: Overview, emerging issues, and challenges. Sustainable Development. 27(5), 910–922.

[13] Hu, A.G., 2015. Innovation and economic growth in East Asia: An overview. Asian Economic Policy Review. 10(1), 19–37.

[14] Crosby, M., 2000. Patents, innovation and growth. Economic Record. 76(234), 255–262.

[15] Petrescu, A.S., 2009. Science and technology for economic growth: New insights from when the data contradicts desktop models. Review of Policy Research. 26(6), 839–880.

[16] Wong, P.K., Ho, Y.P., Autio, E., 2005. Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics. 24, 335–350.

[17] Nadiri, M.I., 1993. NBER Working Paper No. 4423: Innovations and Technological Spillovers . National Bureau Of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w4423

[18] Mansfield, E., 1972. Contribution of R&D to economic growth in the United States. Science. 175(4021), 477–486.

[19] Vivarelli, M., 2022. Quaderno No. 24: Innovation and Employment: A Short Update. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento di Politica Economica: Milano, Italy. Available from: https://dipartimenti.unicatt.it/politica-economica-DIPE0024.pdf

[20] De Janvry, A., Graff, G., Sadoulet, E., et al., 2000. Technological change in agriculture and poverty reduction: the potential role of biotechnology. In: Cooper, J., Lipper, L.M., Zilberman, D. (Eds.). Agricultural Biodiversity and Biotechnology in Economic Development. Natural Resource Management and Policy, Vol 27. Springer: Boston, MA, USA. pp. 361–386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25409-9_17

[21] Dhrifi, A., 2014. Agricultural productivity and poverty alleviation: What role for technological innovation. Journal of Economic and Social Studies. 4(1), 139–158.

[22] Sachs, J.D., 2005. Can extreme poverty be eliminated? Scientific American. 293(3), 56–65.

[23] Berdegue, J., Escobar, G., 2002. Rural Diversity, Agricultural Innovation Policies and Poverty Reduction. ODI: Agricultural Research and Extension Network: London, UK. Available from: https://rimisp.org/wp-content/files_mf/135912510629.pdf

[24] World Bank, 2024. Cameroon. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/cameroon/overview (cited 16 June 2025).

[25] World Bank, 2024. Democratic Republic of Congo. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/drc/overview (cited 16 June 2025).

[26] Daniels, C., Floyd, R., Edjigu, H., 2022. Harnessing technology to improve Africa’s productivity and economic transformation. African Center for Economic Transformation. Available from: https://acetforafrica.org/research-and-analysis/insights-ideas/commentary/harnessing-technology-to-improve-africas-productivity-and-economic-transformation/ (cited 16 June 2025).

[27] Malikane, C., Chitambara, P., 2017. Foreign direct investment, productivity and the technology gap in African economies. Journal of African Trade. 4(1–2), 61–74.

[28] Lage, F., Cirera, X., Sabetti, L., 2016. ICT Use, Innovation, and Productivity: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank: Washington, DC, USA.

[29] Bank of Scotland, 2023. Bank of Scotland International Trade Portal. Available from: https://www.bankofscotlandtrade.co.uk/en (cited 16 June 2025).

[30] World View Data, 2022. Economy of Cameroon. Available from: https://www.worldviewdata.com/countries/cameroon/economy (cited 16 June 2025).

[31] Lloyds Banking Group, 2025. Lloyds Bank International Trade Portal. Available from: https://www.lloydsbanktrade.com/en (16 June 2025).

[32] African Development Bank, 2023. Republic of Cameroun. Available from: https://www.afdb.org/en/countries/central-africa/cameroon (cited 17 June 2025).

[33] Lloyds Bank International, 2024. The economic context of Cameroon. Available from: https://www.lloydsbanktrade.com/en/market-potential/cameroon/economical-context (cited 25 June 2025).

[34] Fosu, A.K., 2023. Progress on poverty in Africa: The importance of growth and inequality. Journal of African Economies. 32(Supplement 2), ii164–ii182.

[35] Pape, U., Parisotto, L., 2019. Estimating Poverty in a Fragile Context: The High Frequency Survey in South Sudan. World Bank: Washington, DC, USA.

[36] Karagozoglu, N., Brown, W.B., 1986. A multilevel, multiphase framework for viewing technological innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 10(2), 15–32.

[37] Omri, A., 2020. Technological innovation and sustainable development: Does the stage of development matter? Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 83, 106398.

[38] Khan, Z., Ali, M., Kirikkaleli, D., et al., 2020. The impact of technological innovation and public-private partnership investment on sustainable environment in China: Consumption-based carbon emissions analysis. Sustainable Development. 28(5), 1317–1330.

[39] Loukil, K., 2016. Foreign direct investment and technological innovation in developing countries. Oradea Journal of Business and Economics. 1(2), 31–40.

[40] Dhrifi, A., 2015. Foreign direct investment, technological innovation and economic growth: Empirical evidence using simultaneous equations model. International Review of Economics. 62(4), 381–400.

[41] DeMarzo, P., Kaniel, R., Kremer, I., 2007. Technological innovation and real investment booms and busts. Journal of Financial Economics. 85(3), 735–754.

[42] Debnath, S., Nilayamgode, M., Sekhri, S., 2022. Information bypass: Using low-cost technological innovations to curb leakages in welfare programs. Journal of Development Economics. 164(490), 103137.

[43] Aung, Y.M., Khor, L.Y., Tran, N., et al., 2023. The impact of sustainable aquaculture technologies on the welfare of small-scale fish farming households in Myanmar. Aquaculture Economics and Management. 27(1), 66–95.

[44] Barnett, B.J., Barrett, C.B., Skees, J.R., 2006. Poverty traps and index based risk transfer products. World Development. 36(10), 1766–1785.

[45] Barrett, C.B., Marenya, P.P., McPeak, J., et al., 2006. Welfare dynamics in rural Kenya and Madagascar. The Journal of Development Studies. 42(2), 248–277.

[46] Parry, I.W., Pizer, W.A., Fischer, C., 2003. How large are the welfare gains from technological innovation induced by environmental policies? Journal of Regulatory Economics. 23, 237–255.

[47] Petrella, R., 1998. Technological innovation and welfare. Concepts and Transformation. 3(3), 283–298.

[48] Ho, P.T., Hung, P.X., Nguyen, P.T.M., 2024. Estimating profit, input demand and output supply elasticities in rice production: Evidence from Vietnam. African Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics. 19(4), 369–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53936/afjare.2024.19(4).22

[49] Ugur, M., Awaworyi Churchill, S., Solomon, E., 2018. Technological innovation and employment in derived labour demand models: A hierarchical meta-regression analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys. 32(1), 50–82.

[50] Tian, J., 2023. Does technological innovation have an impact on employment in the hospitality industry? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.

[51] Jin, W., Wang, Y., Yan, Y., et al., 2025. Digital Economy, Green Finance, and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China. Sustainability. 17(12), 5625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125625

[52] Medase, S.K., Wyrwich, M., 2022. The role of innovation for employment growth among firms in developing countries: Evidence from Nigeria. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development. 14(3), 610–619.

[53] Dosi, G., Mohnen, P., 2019. Innovation and employment: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change. 28(1), 45–49.

[54] Greenan, N., Guellec, D., 2000. Technological innovation and employment reallocation. Labour. 14(4), 547–590.

[55] Van Reenen, J., 1997. Employment and technological innovation: Evidence from UK manufacturing firms. Journal of Labour Economics. 15(2), 255–284.

[56] Bogliacino, F., Pianta, M., 2010. Innovation and employment: A reinvestigation using revised Pavitt classes. Research Policy. 39(6), 799–809.

[57] Benavente, J.M., Lauterbach, R., 2008. Technological innovation and employment: Complements or substitutes? The European Journal of Development Research. 20, 318–329.

[58] Acar, M., Sever, E., 2022. The effect of innovation on employment: An ARDL bounds testing approach for Turkey. Sosyoekonomi. 30(51), 33–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2022.01.02

[59] Barbieri, L., Mussida, C., Piva, M., et al., 2019. IZA Discussion Paper No. 12612: Testing the employment impact of automation, robots and AI: A Survey and Some Methodological Issues. Institute of Labor Economics: Shenzhen, China. Available from: https://docs.iza.org/dp12612.pdf

[60] Dosi, G., Piva, M., Virgillito, M.E., et al., 2021. Embodied and disembodied technological change: The sectoral patterns of job–creation and job–destruction. Research Policy. 50(4), 104199.

[61] Si, S., Ahlstrom, D., Wei, J., et al., 2021. Introduction: Business, entrepreneurship and innovation toward poverty reduction. In Business, Entrepreneurship and Innovation toward Poverty Reduction. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 1–20.

[62] Zameer, H., Shahbaz, M., Vo, X.V., 2020. Reinforcing poverty alleviation efficiency through technological innovation, globalization, and financial development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 161, 120326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120326

[63] Wang, R., Tan, J., 2021. Exploring the coupling and forecasting of financial development, technological innovation, and economic growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 163, 120466.

[64] Ye, Y., Chen, S., Li, C., 2022. Financial technology as a driver of poverty alleviation in China: Evidence from an innovative regression approach. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge. 7(1), 100164.

[65] Srinivas, S., Sutz, J., 2008. Developing countries and innovation: Searching for a new analytical approach. Technology in Society. 30(2), 129–140.

[66] Smith, A., Fressoli, M., Thomas, H., 2014. Grassroots innovation movements: Challenges and contributions. Journal of Cleaner Production. 63, 114–124.

[67] Wang, W., Xiao, W., Bai, C., 2022. Can renewable energy technology innovation alleviate energy poverty? Perspective from the marketization level. Technology in Society. 68, 101933.

[68] Zhao, J., Shahbaz, M., Dong, K., 2022. How does energy poverty eradication promote green growth in China? The role of technological innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 175, 121384.

[69] Abdelkhalek, T., Boccanfuso, D., Savard, L., 2022. Impact of the Covid–19 pandemic on monetary child poverty in Morocco. International Journal of Microsimulation. 15(3), 15–37.

[70] Bouët, A., Labourde, D., Traoré, F., 2018. The European Union–West Africa economic partnership agreement: Small impact and new questions. The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development. 27(1), 25–53.

[71] Chen, S., Ravallion, M., 2004. Welfare impacts of China’s accession to the World Trade Organization. The World Bank Economic Review. 18(1), 29–57.

[72] Hossain, S.S., Delin, H., Mingying, M., 2022. Aftermath of climate change on Bangladesh economy: An analysis of the dynamic computable general equilibrium model. Journal of Water and Climate Change. 13(7), 2597–2609.

[73] Bakouan, P., Dialga, I., Zidouemba, P.R., 2022. A comparative analysis of the effects of the African Continental Free Trade Agreement on the economic impacts of COVID–19 in North and Southern Africa. Journal of Economic Integration. 37(1), 121–157.

[74] Lemelin, A., 2017. Current account balances, exchange rates, and fundamental properties of Walrasian CGE world models: A pedagogical exposition. Journal of Global Economic Analysis. 2(1), 215–324.

[75] Decaluwé, B., Lemelin, A., Robichaud, V., et al., 2013. PEP–1–t: The PEP standard single-country, recursive dynamic CGE model (Version 2.1). Partnership for Economic Policy Research Network, Université Laval: Québec, QC, Canada.

[76] Han, D., Huang, G., Liu, L., et al., 2023. Factorial CGE-based analysis for the indirect benefits of the Three Gorges Project. Water Resources Research. 59(4), e2022WR033360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033360

[77] Armington, P.S., 1969. IMF Staff Papers, 1969(001), A007: A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. Available from: https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/024/1969/001/article-A007-en.xml (cited 16 June 2025).

[78] Lennox, J.A., Parrado, R., 2015. Working Paper No. 2015.02: Capital-embodied technologies in CGE models. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2553125 (cited 16 June 2025).

[79] Abouna, M.P., 2025. A CGE-microsimulation approach with educational choices to assess the economic and distributional impacts of policies amidst technological change [PhD Thesis]. Université de Sherbrooke: Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.

[80] Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F.H., Lustig, N., 2004. The Microeconomics of Income Distribution Dynamics in East Asia and Latin America. World Bank Publications: Washington, DC, USA.

[81] Bonga-Bonga, L., Mbanda, V., 2025. Computable general equilibrium-microsimulation analysis of electricity price increases in South Africa. Utilities Policy. 95, 101936.

[82] Foster, J., Greer, J., Thorbecke, E., 1984. A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. 761–766.

[83] Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, D., Schmidt, L.D., et al., 2020. Working Paper No. 26964: Technological Innovation and Labour Income Risk. National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w26964

[84] Storm, S., Isaacs, G., 2016. Modelling the Impact of a National Minimum Wage in South Africa: Are General Equilibrium Models Fit for Purpose? (Research brief National Minimum Wage Research Initiative; No. 1). University of the Witwatersrand: Johannesburg, South Africa. Available from: https://research.tudelft.nl/en/publications/modelling-the-impact-of-a-national-minimum-wage-in-south-africa-a/

[85] Oltra, M.J., Flor, M., 2003. The impact of technological opportunities and innovative capabilities on firms’ output innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management. 12(3), 137–144.

[86] Dhahri, S., Omri, A., 2020. Foreign capital towards SDGs 1 and 2—Ending poverty and hunger: The role of agricultural production. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 53, 208–221.

Downloads

How to Cite

Nobosse Tchoffo, R., Tchouamou Njoya, E., & Zeufack Nkemgha, G. (2026). Harnessing Technological Innovation for Poverty Reduction: Sectoral and Microsimulation Insights from Cameroon and the DRC. Journal of Emerging Markets and Management, 2(1), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.63385/jemm.v2i1.307