Eco-Tourism and Sustainable Development

Publisher Name Change Notice: Starting in 2026, all journals and manuscripts will be published under the new publisher name Nature and Information Engineering Publishing Sdn. Bhd.

The Great Lakes Way: A Case Study of Connecting People to Natural Resources and Expanding Ecotourism

Authors

  • John H. Hartig

    Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B3P4, Canada

    Author
  • Lynn Whipple

    PEA Group, Detroit, MI 48226, USA

    Author
  • Burke Jenkins

    PEA Group, Detroit, MI 48226, USA

    Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63385/etsd.v2i1.452

Keywords:

Ecosystem Approach, Greenways, the Great Lakes Way, Boundary Organization

Abstract

The United States and Canada have promoted using an ecosystem approach in protecting and restoring the North American Great Lakes for over 40 years. Building on this foundation, the Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan and partners have applied a similar approach in creating a 240-km interwoven set of water trails and greenways in metropolitan Detroit, Michigan, USA called the Great Lakes Way. Five-year accomplishments identified in this case-based reflection include: a Great Lakes Way Advisory Committee serving as a boundary organization, a consensus vision map, signed collaboration agreements with 45 communities/trail stakeholders, an increase in the total number of usable and funded greenways from 167 km in 2020 to 199 km in 2024, a Memorandum of Understanding between U.S. and Canadian trail organizations to foster transboundary trail tourism, and estimated annual economic benefits of $3.75–5 billion USD. Key case study insights that have helped advance this trail initiative include: 1) facilitating stakeholder agreement on a compelling vision; 2) building capacity; 3) empowering a boundary organization to collaborate on a common goal; 4) co-generating of knowledge and solutions; and 5) practicing adaptive resource management. Remaining challenges include sustaining meaningful community engagement, ensuring long-term funding, monitoring user attitudes/behaviors, and supporting research that strengthens and sustains this boundary organization and science-policy-management linkages.

References

[1] Richardson, M., 2025. Modelling Nature Connectedness within Environmental Systems: Human–Nature Relationships from 1800 to 2020 and Beyond. Earth. 6(3), 82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/earth6030082

[2] Chai, D., Liu, K., 2025. The Network–Place Effect of Urban Greenways on Residents’ Pro-Nature Behaviors: A Systematic Review. Sustainability. 17(24), 11117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su172411117

[3] Gobster, P.H., Westphal, L.M., 2004. The Human Dimensions of Urban Greenways: Planning for Recreation and Related Experiences. Landscape and Urban Planning. 68(2–3), 147–165.

[4] Little, C.E., 1990. Greenways for America. John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA.

[5] Arendt, R., 2011. Putting Greenways First. Planning. 77(7), 28–33.

[6] Coutts, C., 2008. Greenway Accessibility and Physical Activity Behavior. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 35(3), 552–563.

[7] Fabos, J.G., 1995. Introduction and Overview: The Greenway Movement, Uses and Potentials of Greenways. Landscape and Urban Planning. 33(1–3), 1–13.

[8] Hutson, G., Baird, J., Ives, C.D., et al., 2024. Outdoor Adventure Education as a Platform for Developing Environmental Leadership. People and Nature. 6(5), 1974–1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10699

[9] Hartig, J.H., 2019. Waterfront Porch: Reclaiming Detroit’s Industrial Waterfront as a Gathering Place for All. Michigan State University Press: East Lansing, MI, USA.

[10] Mumaw, L., 2017. Transforming Urban Gardeners into Land Stewards. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 52, 92–103.

[11] Hartig, J.H., Scott, T., Gell, G., et al., 2022. Reconnecting People to the Detroit River—A Transboundary Effort. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management. 25(1), 27–38.

[12] Martin Associates, 2023. Economic Impacts of Maritime Shipping in the Great Lakes–St. Lawrence Region. Martin Associates: Lancaster, PA, USA.

[13] Hartig, J.H., 2014. Bringing Conservation to Cities: Lessons from the Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management Society: Burlington, ON, Canada.

[14] Appel, L.M., Craves, J.A., Smith, M.K., et al., 2002. Explore Our Natural World: A Biodiversity Atlas of the Lake Huron to Lake Erie Corridor. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Chicago, IL, USA.

[15] Dempsey, D., 2019. The Heart of the Great Lakes: Freshwater in the Past, Present, and Future of Southeast Michigan. Michigan State University Press: East Lansing, MI, USA.

[16] Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan, 2024. Reports on the Great Lakes Way. Available from: https://cfsem.org/initiative/greatlakesway/reports/ (cited 31 January 2025).

[17] Great Lakes Science Advisory Board, 1978. Ecosystem Approach: Scope and Implications of an Ecosystem Approach to Transboundary Problems in the Great Lakes Basin. International Joint Commission: Windsor, ON, Canada.

[18] Canada and the United States, 1978. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. International Joint Commission: Windsor, ON, Canada.

[19] Convention on Biological Diversity, 2019. The Ecosystem Approach: Advanced User Guide. Convention on Biological Diversity: Montreal, QC, Canada.

[20] Vigna, I., Besana, A., Comino, E., et al., 2021. Application of the Socio-Ecological System Framework to Forest Fire Risk Management: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability. 13(4), 2121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042121

[21] Vallentyne, J.R., Beeton, A.M., 1988. The Ecosystem Approach to Managing Human Uses and Abuses of Natural Resources in the Great Lakes Basin. Environmental Conservation. 15(1), 58–62.

[22] Hartig, J.H., Krantzberg, G., Alsip, P., 2020. Thirty-Five Years of Restoring Great Lakes Areas of Concern: Gradual Progress, Hopeful Future. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 46(3), 429–442.

[23] Great Lakes Water Quality Board, 1985. Report on Great Lakes Water Quality. Great Lakes Water Quality Board: Windsor, ON, Canada.

[24] Alsip, P., Hartig, J.H., Krantzberg, G., et al., 2021. Evolving Institutional Arrangements for Use of an Ecosystem Approach in Restoring Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Sustainability. 13(3), 1532–1554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031532

[25] Scott, T., Gell, G., 2020. The Legacy of Bicycles in Detroit, Michigan: A Look at Greenways through Time. In: Hartig, J.H., Francoeur, S.F., Ciborowski, J.J.H., et al. (Eds.). Checkup: Assessing Ecosystem Health of the Detroit River and Western Lake Erie. University of Windsor: Windsor, ON, Canada. pp. 451–458.

[26] Winter, P.L., Selin, S., Cerveny, L., et al., 2020. Outdoor Recreation, Nature-Based Tourism, and Sustainability. Sustainability. 12(1), 81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010081

[27] Dolesh, R.J., 2004. Tough Terrain: The Conflicts Associated with Multi-Use Trails. Parks & Recreation. 39(10), 1–56.

[28] Stoffelen, A., 2022. Transboundary Routes and Trails: Cooperation and Scalar Considerations. In: Timothy, D.J., Gelbman, A. (Eds.). Routledge Handbook of Borders and Tourism. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 379–390.

[29] Hartig, J.H., Newton, L., Scott, T., et al., 2025. Fostering Cross-Border Trail Tourism between Windsor, Ontario, Canada and Detroit, Michigan, USA. Green Health. 1(3), 20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/greenhealth1030020

[30] Austin, J., Steinman, A., Weinstein, A., 2023. The Great Lakes Way: Enriching Life at the Heart of the Great Lakes. Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan: Detroit, MI, USA.

[31] Chakraborty, K., 2019. Economic Benefits of Biking Trails and Greenways. Business and Economic Research. 9(2), 199–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ber.v9i2.14727

[32] Hartig, J.H., Wallace, M.C., 2015. Creating World-Class Gathering Places for People and Wildlife along the Detroit Riverfront, Michigan, USA. Sustainability. 7(11), 15073–15098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su71115073

[33] Hartig, J.H., Godwin, C.M., Ellis, B., et al., 2024. Co-Production of Knowledge and Co-Innovation of Solutions for Contaminated Sediments in the Detroit and Rouge Rivers. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 50(2), 102304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2024.102304

[34] Bentley, S.J., Cochran, M., Hartig, J.H., 2019. From Cleanup of the River Raisin to Revitalization of Monroe, Michigan. In: Hartig, J.H., Krantzberg, G., Austin, J.C., et al. (Eds.). Great Lakes Revival: How Restoring Polluted Waters Leads to Rebirth of Great Lakes Communities. International Association for Great Lakes Research: Ann Arbor, MI, USA. pp. 47–51.

[35] Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, 2017. Recommendation Removal: Loss of Fish and Wildlife Habitat Beneficial Use Impairment, St. Clair River Area of Concern. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality: Lansing, MI, USA.

[36] Senge, P.M., 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Currency Doubleday Books: New York, NY, USA.

[37] United Nations, 2025. Capacity-Building. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/academic-impact/capacity-building (cited 20 December 2025).

[38] Gray, N.J., 2016. The Role of Boundary Organizations in Co-Management: Examining the Politics of Knowledge Integration in a Marine Protected Area in Belize. International Journal of the Commons. 10(2), 1013–1034.

[39] James, C.A., Francis, T.B., Baker, J.E., et al., 2022. A Boundary Spanning System Supports Large-Scale Ecosystem-Based Management. Environmental Science & Policy. 133, 137–145.

[40] Sattler, C., Schröter, B., 2022. Collective Action across Boundaries: Collaborative Network Initiatives as Boundary Organizations to Improve Ecosystem Services Governance. Ecosystem Services. 56, 101452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101452

[41] Honeck, E., Gallagher, L., von Arx, B., et al., 2021. Integrating Ecosystem Services into Policymaking—A Case Study on the Use of Boundary Organizations. Ecosystem Services. 49, 101286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101286

[42] Beier, P., Hansen, L.J., Helbrecht, L., et al., 2017. A How-to Guide for Coproduction of Actionable Science. Conservation Letters. 10(3), 288–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12300

[43] Palmer, M.A., 2012. Socioenvironmental Sustainability and Actionable Science. BioScience. 62(1), 5–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.2

[44] Holling, C.S., 1978. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis: Laxenburg, Austria.

[45] Pahl-Wostl, C., 2007. Transitions towards Adaptive Management of Water Facing Climate and Global Change. Water Resources Management. 21, 49–62.

[46] Spruijt-Metz, D., Wolch, J., Jerrett, M., et al., 2010. Development, Reliability, and Validity of an Urban Trail Use Survey. American Journal of Health Promotion. 25(1), 2–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.071105119

[47] Marasinghe, S., Perera, P., Simpson, G.D., et al., 2021. Nature-Based Tourism Development in Coastal Wetlands of Sri Lanka: An Importance–Performance Analysis at Maduganga Mangrove Estuary. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism. 33, 100345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2020.100345

Downloads

How to Cite

H. Hartig, J., Whipple, L., & Jenkins, B. (2026). The Great Lakes Way: A Case Study of Connecting People to Natural Resources and Expanding Ecotourism. Eco-Tourism and Sustainable Development, 2(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.63385/etsd.v2i1.452